[Freeswitch-users] Skype

[Stephen Dame]

I use skype names to sip calls into freeswitch, currently in production since 2011 for internet talk radio solution that uses FreeSWITCH.

 

Just buy sip channels and point to sip profile and you get concurrent unlimited calls for $6 port.

 

I haven’t tried adding new ones recently.   Buts its really easy to test.

 

They use to connect in 10-15 seconds,  seems like now it is more like 30-45 seconds before it hits freeswitch.

 

Regards,

Stephen

 

HostBBB – Online Learning Solutions  

207 Technology Group Inc.   1-888-229-9756  skype: Stephen_Dame

 

From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Rick Jarvis
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 2:27 PM
To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Skype

 

Thanks for the info Giovanni. That would be a real shame if they do that (but it wouldn’t surprise me at all), I was gutted and extremely cynical when I heard about the acquisition. Do let me / us all know if you hear anything more.

 

Can anyone confirm my suspicion about inbound skypename->sip calls?

 

On 4 Aug 2016, at 18:34, Giovanni Maruzzelli <gmaruzz at gmail.com <mailto:gmaruzz at gmail.com> > wrote:

 

About skypopen: I suspect they (M$) will retract support soon for the protocol/API used by mod_skypopen. 

Don't seriously invest in it until situation will clarify, probably in Autumn...

6 concurrent call limit can be overridden in many ways, but I repeat, I would not counseil to seriously invest in it until Autumn.

I'm mod_skypopen author, btw.

If someone has more info, please step up and let us know.

 

-giovanni

 

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Rick Jarvis <rick at magicmail.mooo.com <mailto:rick at magicmail.mooo.com> > wrote:

Skype are telling me that it is no longer possible to receive calls to Skype names / addresses (as appose to Skype numbers) via SIP with Skype Connect. Does anyone know if this is the case? Their support is awful, but this would seem a bit of a backward step, and I don’t know whether to trust what I’m being told.

The alternative is Skypopen, of course. But I notice that it has a maximum of 6 concurrent calls. Is this for resource reasons? I’m thinking of building a server to handle all Skype to SIP calls for our customers, so would be interested to know if it’s possible to bypass the limit with a beefy spec…?

Thanks
R
_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting at freeswitch.org <mailto:consulting at freeswitch.org> 
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com <http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com/> 

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org <http://www.freeswitch.org/> 
http://confluence.freeswitch.org <http://confluence.freeswitch.org/> 
http://www.cluecon.com <http://www.cluecon.com/> 

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org> 
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org <http://www.freeswitch.org/> 




-- 

Sincerely,

Giovanni Maruzzelli
Cell : +39-347-2665618

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: 
consulting at freeswitch.org <mailto:consulting at freeswitch.org> 
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org> 
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20160804/e13e5a42/attachment.html