[Freeswitch-users] Running on port 443, pros and cons...

Sergey Safarov s.safarov at gmail.com
Wed Oct 28 19:42:05 MSK 2015

I think is bad idea to make call trough HTTP proxy.
FS can work on any port if no man(proxy) in the middle.

Try authenticate on HTTP proxy and scan what is TCP and UDP ports open
communication. Then make decisions.

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Volodymyr Fedorov <lexxua at gmail.com> wrote:

>  Actually unfortunately vpn is not so ideal solution. You have to support
> VPN-server, Certificates so on. And not all of types vpn can use only one
> tcp port that can be changed (I know that only OpenVPN can do this). And
> usage it on mobile clients gives another layer of problems.
> Interesting how WebRTC works behind proxy / nat with crazy firewall rules
> ? Someone in mailing list test it ?
> Thanks.
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20151028/f65ea8f8/attachment.html 

Join us at ClueCon 2016 Aug 8-12, 2016
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list