[Freeswitch-users] fail_on_single_reject and sequential bridge fail-over?

[Avi Marcus]

I've never been clear on how this works.

However, the most typical case - you get a USER_BUSY so don't try any more
carriers - I've found to my surprise that other carriers sometimes are able
to complete the call...

-Avi

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Victor Chukalovskiy <
victor.chukalovskiy at gmail.com> wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> Just discovered that fail_on_single_reject does not work with "|"
> operator...
>
> Not sure if it was always the case or a recent "improvement"
>
> Is there something equivalent that can be used with sequential bridge,
> that is with | operator?
> The goal is that if I bridge to
> "sofia/gw1/5555555555|sofia/gw2/5555555555 and I get one of the
> rejection codes I expect over gw1 it should not attempt  gw2
>
> Thx!
> -Victor
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20150121/815e5231/attachment.html