[Freeswitch-users] mobile to mobile over 3g/4g

[Brian West]

FYI proxy media mode is not needed and not what you think it is, FS always
proxies the media, on AT&T you just need stun and it just works for me.

On Saturday, January 17, 2015, Kristian Kielhofner <kris at kriskinc.com>
wrote:

> You want ICE.
>
> On Saturday, January 17, 2015, Assaf Dahary <adahary at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','adahary at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> I desided to check each mobile operator network by trying first bypass
>> mode and if it fails then redial automaticalky with proxy mode (and not
>> trying it again with this operator).
>>
>> For those mobile network (fail bypass) users the alternatives can be:
>> - buying static public ip from operator.
>> - setting up mobile operator VPN  group with public access to FS.
>> - setting up common local VPN server to share direct connectivity for
>> users group.
>> On Jan 17, 2015, at 16:30, Bote Man <bote_radio at botecomm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have it on good authority that AT&T in the U.S. assigns public i.p.
>>> addresses to each device, but is subject to firewall rules whatever they
>>> might be.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> They offer "enterprise static i.p. service" that allows greater freedom,
>>> however. Sounds expensive and scary.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I agree with Steven Ayre: I would not depend on having necessary
>>> connectivity.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bote
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Assaf Dahary
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, 15 January, 2015 11:47
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] mobile to mobile over 3g/4g
>>>
>>> It seems that some mobile operators allow internal direct connectivity
>>> and some just block it.
>>>
>>> Direct connectivity will increase call quality and drop call latency.
>>>
>>> I should start mapping mobile operators by trying first bypass media on
>>> internal calls and if fail then to cancel it and call via FS .
>>>
>>> On Jan 15, 2015, at 18:32, Steven Ayre <steveayre at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I would expect that while it might work on some operators you won't be
>>> able to rely on it working for all mobile networks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If your users aren't under your control and therefore aren't on networks
>>> you've had an opportunity to test this on then you'll probably see many
>>> calls with no audio.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 15 January 2015 at 13:33, Assaf Dahary <adahary at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm currently using bypass_media to make two mobile call each directly
>>> (RTP bypass FS) over the same wifi network.
>>>
>>> Once I detect that caller and callee are sharing the same WiFi network
>>> then I switch to bypass_media in dialplan (works well in big complex
>>> buildings).
>>>
>>> I would like also to use the same bypass_media mode when mobiles connect
>>> over 3g/4g data mobile network.
>>>
>>> I fully understand that both mobiles should be connected to the same
>>> mobile operator and should share a common subnet routing (without NAT) for
>>> them to 'see' each other private IP addr.
>>>
>>> Is it possible for two mobiles on the same mobile 3g/4g network to ping
>>> each other using their private IP addr?
>>>
>>> Should mobile operators allow this kind of direct peer connections (I
>>> couldn't ping internally with my Orange mobile operator)?
>>>
>>> Did anyone successfully make a direct bypass_media call between two sip
>>> mobiles over 3g/4g network?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> assaf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
>>> consulting at freeswitch.org
>>> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>>>
>>> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
>>> http://www.cluecon.com
>>>
>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Sent from mobile device
>


-- 

*Brian West*
brian at freeswitch.org


*Twitter: @FreeSWITCH , @briankwest*
http://www.freeswitchbook.com
http://www.freeswitchcookbook.com

*T:*+19184209001 | *F:*+19184209002 | *M:*+1918424WEST (9378)
*iNUM:*+883 5100 1420 9001 | *ISN:*410*543 | *Skype:*briankwest
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20150117/f6988885/attachment-0001.html