[Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch + serial forking at opensips
john.nash778 at gmail.com
Mon Jan 12 18:22:25 MSK 2015
Looks like a good work around. But if we have only one instance of
freeswitch, can different profile be used (Listening on different port)?
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Grant Bagdasarian <gb at cm.nl> wrote:
> I’ve fought with the 482 Request merged response for a long time in
> Freeswitch, and lost.
> I ended up sending any subsequent INVITEs to another instance of
> *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:
> freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *John Nash
> *Sent:* Monday, January 12, 2015 1:10 PM
> *To:* freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> *Subject:* [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch + serial forking at opensips
> I am facing an issue when using opensips to serial fork Invites to some
> SIP gateways and using freeswitch in the middle as b2bua to send calls.
> That means if first Invite fails opensips will pick next available gateway
> and append branch to send this again to freeswitch.
> But I have noticed when first gateway sends a failed response (and
> freeswitch log shows call destroyed) and second invite is sent (Same call
> id, cseq but different branch tag) , freeswitch seem to have old
> transaction alive and sends 482 Request merged response.
> I saw in mail archives that it was discussed few years back but there was
> no conclusion.
> Is there a reason freeswitch keeps transaction alive (for 4 seconds I
> think) even if it received "ACK" for failed response?
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
Join us at ClueCon 2016 Aug 8-12, 2016
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users