[Freeswitch-users] SIP over Websocket VS SIP over TCP

[Anthony Minessale]

The WebRTC media engine is driven completely by the SDP, the transport will
not make any difference.


On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Adam Ben-Ayoun <adam.ben.ayoun1 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We are developing a mobile client that will use the WebRTC media stack and
> Freeswitch as an MCU (only for conference calls). My question is, since we
> build a native app, can we use SIP over TCP for signalling? In other words,
> if Freeswitch receives the WebRTC kind of SDP, will it be able to
> communicate in the same way as if we were using the SIP over Websocket (the
> other Freeswitch option)? Any corner cases/considerations with this? Our
> goal is to avoid implementing SIP over Websocket on the client as much as
> possible.
>
> Thanks,
> Adam
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>



-- 
Anthony Minessale II       ♬ @anthmfs  ♬ @FreeSWITCH  ♬

☞ http://freeswitch.org/  ☞ http://cluecon.com/  ☞
http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH
☞ irc.freenode.net #freeswitch ☞ *http://freeswitch.org/g+
<http://freeswitch.org/g+>*

ClueCon Weekly Development Call
☎ sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org  ☎ +19193869900
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20150110/cc3580c8/attachment.html