[Freeswitch-users] Scaling FreeSWITCH horizontally with master master replication

[Florent Krieg]

Hi Ashwin,

I don't know very well Postgres but I achieved pretty much the same
(horizontal scaling) with a MySQL cluster. Replication is a bit painful to
setup and to maintain (especially master master, including db
desynchronization when crashes occur and so on). I would go for a cluster,
almost endlessly scalable and very very reliable. It is more costly to
setup but I think it is worth the pain.

My feelings, I don't pretend to be a reference though :)

Florent
Le 2 janv. 2015 20:42, "Ashwin Rath" <ashwinrath at gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hi All
>
> I am trying to scale FS by having individual nodes running FS that have
> the core in Postgres. The idea is to have any number of FS boxes behind a
> load balancer depending on the load.
>
> Just wanted to ask if master master replication is reliable for say 10 FS
> nodes holding presence as well as session info ?
>
> or would it just bea better idea to build a highly available postgres sql
> cluster and point all FS to it ?
>
>
> --
> Ashwin Kumar Rath
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20150102/2e5b9d93/attachment.html