[Freeswitch-users] sip_route_uri with simplify ( uuid_simplify & auto simplify )

[jay binks]

Its also really good when you have

Box A    ----  Box B  ---- Box C

and Box B was used to setup the call, but is doing little more than
proxying traffic.

Im using it in this way, where Box A is my carrier side SBC , Box C is my
Customer side SBC
and I have call handling logic in Box B.

Once the call is established, Box B can get out of the path.
I do this so we can remove a potential point of failure.








On 20 February 2015 at 07:51, Brian West <brian at freeswitch.org> wrote:

> Simplify is only for dumping the entire call media and signaling off to
> prevent hair pinning of media.
>
> Example:
>
> BOX A -> BOX B -> BOX A, If this path were to take place a simplify
> operation could take place to send the media back to BOX A, This is handy
> if BOX A is on the east coast and BOX B is on the west coast.  Cuts
> un-needed latency out of the path.
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:24 AM, jay binks <jaybinks at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Can anyone give a working example of auto simplify ?? I can't  make it
>> work, but a media hook calling uuid_simplify works great.
>>
>> Bit odd.
>> On 20 Feb 2015 00:37, "jay binks" <jaybinks at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> hmmm seems I had to play further with
>>>
>>> sip_route_uri
>>> and
>>> sip_invite_req_uri
>>>
>>> to make this work, but it works now..
>>>
>>>
>>> I do still wonder if simplify should use the request URI in the Refer-To
>>> header instead of what appears to be the SIP To URI.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 19 February 2015 at 23:12, jay binks <jaybinks at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Im bringing up a call ( "Freeswitch node A" ) where im using
>>>> sip_route_uri to send the call via a specific node in my network
>>>> "Freeswitch node B".
>>>>
>>>> but I also want to get this "Freeswitch Node A" out of the call path
>>>> after the call is answerd.
>>>> "simplify" works great for this.
>>>>
>>>> however when I try and simplify a call, that was brought up with a
>>>> sip_route_uri
>>>> my simplify fails ! :(
>>>>
>>>> The Refer-To: sent by "FS node A" contains the SIP URI for my call ,
>>>> but has no reference to the details used in sip_route_uri meaning nothing
>>>> was sent to "Freeswitch node B"
>>>>
>>>> is this a bug, or am I missing something in the use case of these 2
>>>> features ??
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sincerely
>>>>
>>>> Jay
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sincerely
>>>
>>> Jay
>>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________________
>> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
>> consulting at freeswitch.org
>> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>>
>> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
>> http://www.cluecon.com
>>
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Brian West*
> brian at freeswitch.org
>
>
> *Twitter: @FreeSWITCH , @briankwest*
> http://www.freeswitchbook.com
> http://www.freeswitchcookbook.com
>
> *T:*+19184209001 | *F:*+19184209002 | *M:*+1918424WEST (9378)
> *iNUM:*+883 5100 1420 9001 | *ISN:*410*543 | *Skype:*briankwest
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>



-- 
Sincerely

Jay
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20150220/b5541479/attachment.html