[Freeswitch-users] Prioritize bandwidth by uuid

[Tristan Mahé]

You can always propose a patch that will set the TOS field of the rtp
packet differently depending on the scenario ( bridge or moh ), and
implement QoS on your network using those TOS fields....

My 2 cents...

Le 19/02/2015 08:32, Michael Jerris a écrit :
> no.
>
>> On Feb 18, 2015, at 11:13 PM, Andrew V <avstarventures at gmail.com
>> <mailto:avstarventures at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Let's say I have a 1000 concurrent calls and 800 of them are on hold
>> with music and 200 of them are live conversations.  The music cannot
>> be turned off.
>> Can I prioritize the bandwidth for the 200 live calls (by uuid) over
>> the on hold calls?
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: 
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20150219/36fcfbf0/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20150219/36fcfbf0/attachment.bin