[Freeswitch-users] sip_route_uri with simplify ( uuid_simplify & auto simplify )

jay binks jaybinks at gmail.com
Thu Feb 19 18:24:07 MSK 2015


Can anyone give a working example of auto simplify ?? I can't  make it
work, but a media hook calling uuid_simplify works great.

Bit odd.
On 20 Feb 2015 00:37, "jay binks" <jaybinks at gmail.com> wrote:

> hmmm seems I had to play further with
>
> sip_route_uri
> and
> sip_invite_req_uri
>
> to make this work, but it works now..
>
>
> I do still wonder if simplify should use the request URI in the Refer-To
> header instead of what appears to be the SIP To URI.
>
>
>
> On 19 February 2015 at 23:12, jay binks <jaybinks at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Im bringing up a call ( "Freeswitch node A" ) where im using
>> sip_route_uri to send the call via a specific node in my network
>> "Freeswitch node B".
>>
>> but I also want to get this "Freeswitch Node A" out of the call path
>> after the call is answerd.
>> "simplify" works great for this.
>>
>> however when I try and simplify a call, that was brought up with a
>> sip_route_uri
>> my simplify fails ! :(
>>
>> The Refer-To: sent by "FS node A" contains the SIP URI for my call , but
>> has no reference to the details used in sip_route_uri meaning nothing was
>> sent to "Freeswitch node B"
>>
>> is this a bug, or am I missing something in the use case of these 2
>> features ??
>>
>> --
>> Sincerely
>>
>> Jay
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely
>
> Jay
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20150220/4a9b6464/attachment-0001.html 


Join us at ClueCon 2016 Aug 8-12, 2016
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list