[Freeswitch-users] sip_route_uri with simplify ( uuid_simplify & auto simplify )

[Avi Marcus]

On this point: I am able to create an SBC node A with FreeSWITCH that
bridges to other FS node B, and auto_simplify will pull the SBC node A out
of the routing?
The only caveat to this is that it's not stateless while the call is
actually ringing, but otherwise, the calls will not rely on node A?
... am I understanding this correctly?

-Avi

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:12 PM, jay binks <jaybinks at gmail.com> wrote:

> Im bringing up a call ( "Freeswitch node A" ) where im using sip_route_uri
> to send the call via a specific node in my network "Freeswitch node B".
>
> but I also want to get this "Freeswitch Node A" out of the call path after
> the call is answerd.
> "simplify" works great for this.
>
> however when I try and simplify a call, that was brought up with a
> sip_route_uri
> my simplify fails ! :(
>
> The Refer-To: sent by "FS node A" contains the SIP URI for my call , but
> has no reference to the details used in sip_route_uri meaning nothing was
> sent to "Freeswitch node B"
>
> is this a bug, or am I missing something in the use case of these 2
> features ??
>
> --
> Sincerely
>
> Jay
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20150219/5c9b6ef9/attachment.html