[Freeswitch-users] FreeSwitch - Performance issues
Ken Rice
krice at freeswitch.org
Sun Aug 16 01:04:59 MSD 2015
One thing i see, we recommend against Ubuntu... There have been many reported issues that can only be tracked back to the distro
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 14, 2015, at 8:43 AM, Shaun Stokes <shaun.stokes at itec-support.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We’re experiencing performance issues with FreeSwitch, our target is 500 concurrent sessions, but at the moment this starts to bottleneck around 30.
>
> Host system:
> Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V Host
> AMD Opteron 4386 (2 processors) – 16 cores total
> 128GB DDR3
> 2TB RAID 5 (700MB/s tested read and write throughput)
>
> FreeSwitch Virtual Machine:
> FreeSwitch 1.4.15
> Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
> 16 Virtual cores (high priority)
> 2GB RAM (would assign more but FreeSwitch never seems to use much)
> 500GB HD (on VHDX)
>
> After around 30 concurrent sessions we begin to see CPU spikes almost every time a new call comes in, as the sessions increase the size and frequency of the CPU spikes also increase. The system seems to be able to sit comfortably with over 100 concurrent sessions and 80% idle CPU, providing we don’t have any new calls hitting the platform. The spikes are causing audio (RTP) to stutter or in some cases drop completely for a few seconds.
>
> The FreeSwitch spikes are occurring on all 16 cores, we have been monitoring the system using htop and mpstat.
>
> This is an example of when we receive an inbound call while we have 34 concurrent sessions:
> 14:26:04 CPU %usr %nice %sys %iowait %irq %soft %steal %guest %idle
> 14:26:05 all 1.67 0.00 27.34 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.74
> 14:26:05 0 1.00 0.00 28.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.00
> 14:26:05 1 0.99 0.00 26.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.28
> 14:26:05 2 0.99 0.00 26.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.28
> 14:26:05 3 3.92 0.00 26.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 69.61
> 14:26:05 4 0.99 0.00 25.74 0.00 1.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.29
> 14:26:05 5 0.99 0.00 26.73 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.29
> 14:26:05 6 0.00 0.00 26.47 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.55
> 14:26:05 7 0.00 0.00 26.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 73.27
> 14:26:05 8 3.96 0.00 27.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.32
> 14:26:05 9 2.00 0.00 27.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.00
> 14:26:05 10 6.00 0.00 32.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 62.00
> 14:26:05 11 1.96 0.00 27.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.59
> 14:26:05 12 0.99 0.00 26.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.28
> 14:26:05 13 1.00 0.00 28.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.00
> 14:26:05 14 0.00 0.00 27.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 73.00
>
> This is when the system is not receiving an inbound call but is sitting comfortably at 34 concurrent sessions:
> 14:25:57 CPU %usr %nice %sys %iowait %irq %soft %steal %guest %idle
> 14:25:58 all 0.87 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.39
> 14:25:58 0 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.02
> 14:25:58 1 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.02
> 14:25:58 2 0.98 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.04
> 14:25:58 3 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.01
> 14:25:58 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.02
> 14:25:58 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.01
> 14:25:58 6 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.01
> 14:25:58 7 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.01
> 14:25:58 8 5.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 94.00
> 14:25:58 9 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.00
> 14:25:58 10 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.00
> 14:25:58 11 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.02
> 14:25:58 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
> 14:25:58 13 1.98 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 97.03
> 14:25:58 14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
> 14:25:58 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
>
> We’re using FreeSwitch in multi-tenant mode, we have tried dedicating a single VM for one tenancy but still experience the issue. My assumption has been that this will be due to the dialplan, I’ve optimized this slightly by writing LUA scripts to handle some of the inbound calls this appears to take away some of the load but we’re still using the internal dialplans for each tenancy (tenancy dialplans have an average of 300 entries).
>
> We are using the following arguments when running FreeSwitch:
> -rp –nc –nonat
>
> I’ve seen another post which says we should operate FreeSwitch in High Performance mode using –hp but can’t find anything information about this, is this still a valid argument to use with FreeSwitch?
>
> Has anyone experienced similar performance issues before or have any advice?
>
> Hope someone may be able help.
>
> Thanks,
> Shaun
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service.
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20150815/329348ef/attachment-0001.html
Join us at ClueCon 2016 Aug 8-12, 2016
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list