[Freeswitch-users] Suspend RTP Transmission Until RTP Has Been Received From Remote Party

[Brian West]

Couldn't you fix your client to report the proper IP in the first place?
What you're proposing would prevent two FreeSWITCH systems from every
talking because neither would send ANYTHING.

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:40 PM, JP <jaykris at gmail.com> wrote:

> I've observed that FreeSWITCH will initially transmit RTP to the remote
> party's private IP address until it has received at least 10 packets, at
> which time it will start sending to the remote party's NATed address.  Is
> there some way to suspend the transmission of RTP altogether until at least
> one packet has been received from the remote party?  It would be ideal if
> this could be controlled on a per call and/or per SIP profile basis.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>



-- 

*Brian West*
brian at freeswitch.org


*Twitter: @FreeSWITCH , @briankwest*
http://www.freeswitchbook.com
http://www.freeswitchcookbook.com

ClueCon 2015 Call for Speakers <https://www.cluecon.com/call-for-speakers/> |
Register <https://freeswitch.com/cart.php?gid=1> TODAY! | Reddit:
/r/freeswitch <https://www.reddit.com/r/freeswitch>

*T:*+19184209001 | *F:*+19184209002 | *M:*+1918424WEST (9378)
*iNUM:*+883 5100 1420 9001 | *ISN:*410*543 | *Skype:*briankwest
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20150424/18e06c68/attachment.html