[Freeswitch-users] continue_on_fail vs fail_on_single_reject

[Steven Ayre]

Agreed, I'd often go with both

fail_on_single_reject - checked between | destinations to see whether to
try the next
continue_on_fail - checked when bridge is about to return to the dialplan
(*not* between | destinations)

On 1 October 2014 21:55, Phillip Jones <pjintheusa at gmail.com> wrote:

> My take - you should be using both:
>
> Example -
>
> <!-- this controls failure action on the dial-plan level -->
> <action application="set" data="continue_on_fail=ALLOTTED_TIMEOUT"/>
>
> <!--the fail_on_single_reject is key here - it is at the call leg level
> and fails such that a second call is not pushed through to the fail-over
> carrier-->
> <action application="bridge"
> data="{leg_timeout=10,fail_on_single_reject=ALLOTTED_TIMEOUT}user/1001|user2/1001"/>
> <action application="bridge"
> data="{leg_timeout=30,fail_on_single_reject=ALLOTTED_TIMEOUT}user/1002|user2/1002"/>
>
>
> So in this scenario - you have "continue_on_fail" to ensure that 1002 WILL
> BE called if 1001 times out, and fail_on_single_reject to ensure that 1001
> will not be called a second time through the failover carrier.
>
> ​Phil
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> 
> 
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20141003/e70c2b63/attachment.html