[Freeswitch-users] Multi-Tenant Versus Multiple FS Instances

[Brian West]

It can be done, it requires the most perfect setup, dns, srv, naptr and a deep understanding of the configuration.  Its a rubix cube do one thing wrong you can't simply peel the stickers off to fix it.

Can't stress PERFET DNS IS REQUIRED.  

--
Brian West
brian at freeswitch.org



Twitter: @FreeSWITCH , @briankwest
http://www.freeswitchbook.com
http://www.freeswitchcookbook.com

T: +1.918.420.9001  |  F: +1.918.420.9002  |  M: +1.918.424.WEST
iNUM: +883 5100 1420 9001
ISN: 410*543
Skype:briankwest
PGP Key: http://www.bkw.org/key.txt (AB93356707C76CED)















On Jun 10, 2014, at 4:37 PM, Jerry Richards <jerry.richards at teotech.com> wrote:

> Has anyone considered the Multi-tenant implementation (as described in the FS Wiki) versus having multiple Freeswitch instances running on the same machine (i.e. one instance for each company)?  I am wondering if there is a trade-off between these two approaches?
> 
> Regards,
> Jerry
> 
> ____________

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20140617/6fbcf33a/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: whmcslogo.png
Type: image/png
Size: 21896 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20140617/6fbcf33a/attachment-0001.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20140617/6fbcf33a/attachment-0001.bin