[Freeswitch-users] Multi-Tenant Versus Multiple FS Instances

[Moishe Grunstein]

The point of Multi-tenant is you should not need to do that, waste valuable resources using multiple VM's, mange many configs (1 for each vm) vs 1 config for all tenants.

With a system that does not support multi-tenant/domain/context, you are forced to do just that, this is one of the many reasons people looking for true multi-tenancy choose Freeswitch over the other options.


Thanks,

Moishe Grunstein
Tornado Computer Systems, Inc.
212.400.7650 888.IPPBX.US
Service Request Email: support at nysolutions.com 
Polycom Certified VAR
Microsoft Small Business Specialist, Cisco SMB Select Certified

Computer Networking * Managed Services * IP Video Surveillance * Network Assessments * Web Solutions * Voice over IP * Disaster Recovery * Network Security * Site Surveys * CMS


-----Original Message-----
From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Jerry Richards
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 5:37 PM
To: FreeSWITCH Users Help
Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Multi-Tenant Versus Multiple FS Instances

Has anyone considered the Multi-tenant implementation (as described in the FS Wiki) versus having multiple Freeswitch instances running on the same machine (i.e. one instance for each company)?  I am wondering if there is a trade-off between these two approaches?

Regards,
Jerry

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting at freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

 

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org