[Freeswitch-users] Incomplete UPDATEs after Attended Transfer

[Joseph Frazier]

I tried the same scenario with proxy-refer, and found that it's still the
case that no UPDATE is sent to the Referee, but also that the UPDATE sent
to the refer target is incorrect. I reported the latter bug to JIRA as
FS-7080: https://freeswitch.org/jira/browse/FS-7080

I'm still unclear on whether I should expect the Referee to receive an
UPDATE. I did see in mod_sofia.c that the nua_update calls are guarded by
User-Agent checks, none of which appear to match the Grandstream:
https://freeswitch.org/stash/projects/FS/repos/freeswitch/browse/src/mod/endpoints/mod_sofia/mod_sofia.c#1630

Perhaps that is the problem?

Thanks,
Joseph

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Joseph Frazier <joseph at onsip.com> wrote:

> The Referee is a "Grandstream GXV3275 1.0.2.15". For context, here's where
> it OKs the INVITE from the first call:
>
>
> https://gist.github.com/joseph-onsip/de90a66afdf37994c334#file-gistfile1-txt-L1813-L1838
>
> Thanks,
> Joseph
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Brian West <brian at freeswitch.org> wrote:
>
>> What device is the Referee?
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Joseph Frazier <joseph at onsip.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to do attended transfers on my FS 1.5.14 box and have the
>>> endpoints receive UPDATE requests indicating that the identity of the other
>>> leg has changed. I installed the v1.5.14 tag from source and uncommented
>>> the following line of sip_profiles/internal.xml:
>>>
>>>    <param name="NDLB-force-rport" value="true"/>
>>>
>>> Other than the above line, my configuration is completely vanilla.
>>>
>>> I have three extensions registered: 1000, 1007, 1006. My scenario is:
>>>
>>>    - 1000 calls 1007
>>>    - 1000 calls 1006
>>>    - 1000 attended transfers 1007 to 1006
>>>
>>> Here is my fs_cli with the following debugging options:
>>>
>>> sofia global siptrace on
>>>> sofia loglevel all 9
>>>> sofia tracelevel alert
>>>> console loglevel debug
>>>> fsctl debug_level 10
>>>
>>>
>>> https://gist.github.com/joseph-onsip/de90a66afdf37994c334
>>>
>>> After receiving the REFER, FS sends an UPDATE to the refer target, but
>>> not to the referee. Is there a configuration option I can set in order to
>>> have an UPDATE sent to the referee as well?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Joseph
>>>
>>> _________________________________________________________________________
>>> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
>>> consulting at freeswitch.org
>>> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>>>
>>> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
>>> http://www.cluecon.com
>>>
>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *Brian West*
>> brian at freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>> *Twitter: @FreeSWITCH , @briankwest*
>> http://www.freeswitchbook.com
>> http://www.freeswitchcookbook.com
>>
>> *T:*+19184209001 | *F:*+19184209002 | *M:*+1918424WEST (9378)
>> *iNUM:*+883 5100 1420 9001 | *ISN:*410*543 | *Skype:*briankwest
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________________
>> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
>> consulting at freeswitch.org
>> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>>
>> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
>> http://www.cluecon.com
>>
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20141211/39c4be17/attachment-0001.html