[Freeswitch-users] WebRTC Calls via Kamailio rejecting with 488

[Anthony Minessale]

You don't include the version of FS you are using.

Also, You should not reply to digest posts when mailing this list.
On Aug 20, 2014 1:50 PM, "Kamrul Khan" <dodul at live.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This is the continuation of my previous mail, "Freeswitch srtp rejecting
> SRTP with 488‏". I have changed the subject line as according to
> the feedback from this mailing list Im convinced its not a SRTP issue. Let
> me describe my scenario a bit more detail.
>
> I am generating call from a webclient using simpl5. The call then hits a
> Kamailio server and Kamailio here acts like a webRTC proxy that forwards
> the call to Freeswitch. Freeswitch receives the call on udp port 5060. (not
> over websocket)
>
> We tested the same thing with asterisk and thats working fine. but when we
> try it with Freeswitch it rejects the call with 488. And in console log it
> shows   [CS_NEW] [INCOMPATIBLE_DESTINATION]
>
> Now, we assume (as per the feedback from this mailing list) the issue is
> not with SRTP but with codec negotiation. Therefore, for testing purpose
> we stripped off all the codec attributes from our INVITE leaving only rtpmap:0
> PCMU/8000 and tested again. We were hoping to see something new in our
> console log this time but surprisingly it showed up the exact same log as
> before. The console log is given below. Please somebody give us some clue
> whats going wrong? Thanks in advanced.
>
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.183856 [DEBUG] sofia.c:5847 IP 192.168.146.133
> Rejected by acl "domains". Falling back to Digest auth.
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.253550 [DEBUG] sofia.c:5847 IP 192.168.146.133
> Rejected by acl "domains". Falling back to Digest auth.
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.269373 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:669 New Channel
> sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133
> [07526f12-2862-11e4-8afd-9de9b4eb98f8]
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.272360 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314
> (sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133) Running State Change CS_NEW
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.272360 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:320
> (sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133) State NEW
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.281094 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4153 Channel sofia/internal/
> alice at 192.168.146.133 entering state [received][100]
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.281094 [DEBUG] sofia.c:4164 Remote SDP:
> v=0
> o=Mozilla-SIPUA-31.0 20849 1 IN IP4 0.0.0.0
> s=Doubango Telecom - firefox
> t=0 0
> a=ice-ufrag:ca607972
> a=ice-pwd:dd5932ce75801e50fae435678cd6755b
> a=fingerprint:sha-256
> 8B:B0:38:A0:DA:3D:7C:DE:7F:76:F0:35:AF:1A:DE:E9:25:8C:16:E7:D4:3F:75:B2:64:56:79:21:2D:16:7D:05
> m=audio 57096 UDP/RTP 0
> c=IN IP4 184.69.59.132
> a=ptime:20
> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
> a=fmtp:101 0-15
> a=extmap:1 urn:ietf:params:rtp-hdrext:ssrc-audio-level
> a=setup:actpass
> a=candidate:0 1 UDP 2128609535 172.16.1.188 57096 typ host
> a=candidate:1 1 UDP 1692467199 184.69.59.132 57096 typ srflx raddr
> 172.16.1.188 rport 57096
> a=candidate:5 1 UDP 2128543999 192.168.56.1 57097 typ host
> a=candidate:10 1 UDP 2128478463 192.168.232.1 57098 typ host
> a=candidate:15 1 UDP 2128412927 192.168.146.1 57099 typ host
> a=candidate:0 2 UDP 2128609534 172.16.1.188 57100 typ host
> a=candidate:1 2 UDP 1692467198 184.69.59.132 57100 typ srflx raddr
> 172.16.1.188 rport 57100
> a=candidate:5 2 UDP 2128543998 192.168.56.1 57101 typ host
> a=candidate:10 2 UDP 2128478462 192.168.232.1 57102 typ host
> a=candidate:15 2 UDP 2128412926 192.168.146.1 57103 typ host
> a=rtcp-mux
>
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.281094 [NOTICE] sofia.c:4354 Hangup sofia/internal/
> alice at 192.168.146.133 [CS_NEW] [INCOMPATIBLE_DESTINATION]
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.281094 [DEBUG] switch_channel.c:2102 Send signal
> sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133 [KILL]
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.282146 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal
> sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133 [BREAK]
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.282146 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314
> (sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133) Running State Change CS_HANGUP
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.282146 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:499
> (sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133) State HANGUP
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.282146 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:414 Channel sofia/internal/
> alice at 192.168.146.133 hanging up, cause: INCOMPATIBLE_DESTINATION
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.328550 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:476 Responding to INVITE
> with: 488
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.328550 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:46
> sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133 Standard HANGUP, cause:
> INCOMPATIBLE_DESTINATION
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.328550 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:499
> (sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133) State HANGUP going to sleep
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.328550 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:333
> (sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133) State Change CS_HANGUP ->
> CS_REPORTING
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.328550 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal
> sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133 [BREAK]
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.328550 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:314
> (sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133) Running State Change CS_REPORTING
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.328550 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:590
> (sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133) State REPORTING
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.328550 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:53
> sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133 Standard REPORTING, cause:
> INCOMPATIBLE_DESTINATION
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.328550 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:590
> (sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133) State REPORTING going to sleep
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.328550 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:327
> (sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133) State Change CS_REPORTING ->
> CS_DESTROY
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.328550 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1021 Send signal
> sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133 [BREAK]
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.328550 [DEBUG] switch_core_session.c:1164 Session 18
> (sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133) Locked, Waiting on external
> entities
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.328550 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1182 Session 18
> (sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133) Ended
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.328550 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:1184 Close
> Channel sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133 [CS_DESTROY]
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.328550 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:428
> (sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133) Running State Change CS_DESTROY
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.328550 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:439
> (sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133) State DESTROY
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.328550 [DEBUG] mod_sofia.c:341 sofia/internal/
> alice at 192.168.146.133 SOFIA DESTROY
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.328550 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:60
> sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133 Standard DESTROY
> 2014-08-20 05:03:42.328550 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:439
> (sofia/internal/alice at 192.168.146.133) State DESTROY going to sleep
>
>
> From: freeswitch-users-request at lists.freeswitch.org
> Subject: FreeSWITCH-users Digest, Vol 98, Issue 138
> To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 22:18:01 +0400
>
> Send FreeSWITCH-users mailing list submissions to
> 	freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	freeswitch-users-request at lists.freeswitch.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	freeswitch-users-owner at lists.freeswitch.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of FreeSWITCH-users digest..."
>
>
>
> --Forwarded Message Attachment--
> From: andretodd at verizon.net
> To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:35:01 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] high pdd
>
> Hi, I’m using the master. Should I try 1.4.7?
>
>
>
> I’ve done a dump after things started to go bad/ backed up.
>
>
>
> I see 8193 threads in _*thread_cond*_timedwait. Looks like its on line 81
> of thread_cond.c  res = WaitForSingleObject(cond->semaphore, timeout_ms);
>
>
>
> The value of timeout_ms is 2016850392.
>
>
>
> Not sure if this means anything.
>
>
>
> Thanks for the support guys.
>
>
>
> Andre
>
>
>
> *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:
> freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Brian West
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:57 AM
> *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help
> *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] high pdd
>
>
>
> 1.2.X is EOL,
>
>
>
> 1.4.7 is the current release.
>
>
>
> We have releases and tags in git that no longer carry the 'stable' moniker
> starting with 1.4.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Andre Demattia <andretodd at verizon.net>
> wrote:
>
> Thanks, I'm using the newest master and the last stable 1.2.23
> We are willing to pay to get this fixed.
> Andre
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale at gmail.com>
> *Sent: *‎8/‎17/‎2014 12:30 PM
>
>
> *To: *Freeswitch-users <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Freeswitch-users] high pdd
> We dont have a lot of tools to troubleshoot windows.  You should mention
> windows in your subject to have a better chance to get the attention of our
> windows users.
> You should consider installing debian 7 on the same hardware and perform
> similar tests to help determine if your issue is o/s specific or not.
> You also have not indicated the revision of FS.  If you have not worked
> with latest master, you should be also to rule out improvements.
>
> On Aug 17, 2014 9:54 AM, "Andre Demattia" <andretodd at verizon.net> wrote:
>
> Yes that's off and I believe all the databases are off too. No
> authentication or registration is enabled.  The sizes of the database are 0
> until I call the shutdown command then its about 90k.  I have the DBS in Ra
> drive too.
>
> Windows seems pretty good until the 3000 sessions per min mark. Then I
> just get long pdd and the threads get backed up then no more sessions can
> be created.
>
> Funny thing is I has 10 profiles and the same results. I also tried two
> consoles with the same results.
>
> FreeSWITCH is great.
>
> I'd be grateful for help. I've worked on this for 2 years and hate to give
> up.
>
> If any one from consulting at freeswitch.org is willing to help I'd
> appreciate that.
>
> Thanks again,
> Andre
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale at gmail.com>
> *Sent: *‎8/‎17/‎2014 10:13 AM
> *To: *Freeswitch-users <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Freeswitch-users] high pdd
> Did you comment out manage-presence ?  Also we have no real idea how well
> FS performs in windows under extreme load.
>
> On Aug 17, 2014 5:42 AM, "Andre Demattia" <andretodd at verizon.net> wrote:
>
> Thanks Ken, I'll try the consulting again.
> Andre
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *Ken Rice <krice at freeswitch.org>
> *Sent: *‎8/‎17/‎2014 1:19 AM
> *To: *FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Freeswitch-users] high pdd
>
> if the last post does not work contact consulting at freeswitch.org for pro
> help from one of the developers... thats about as far as the list will take
> you
>
> Ken
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>
> On Aug 16, 2014, at 15:23, "Andre" <andretodd at verizon.net> wrote:
>
> Going with the idea it’s IO related I did a db_cache status. I just
> disabled limit in my code by removing it but limit should be HASH not a
> database however I stills how a database.
>
>
>
> Below is the results of the db cache status. I’m not real sure what its
> saying. I should have all registration and limit disabled and should not be
> using any sql database from my understanding.
>
>
>
> Anyone know what the results mean? I’ve only tested 2 calls on this status.
>
>
>
> [The entire original message is not included.]
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> 
> 
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>
>
>
> [The entire original message is not included.]
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> 
> 
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> *Brian West*
> brian at freeswitch.org
>
> *Twitter: @FreeSWITCH , @briankwest*
> http://www.freeswitchbook.com
> http://www.freeswitchcookbook.com
> *T:*+19184209001 | *F:*+19184209002 | *M:*+1918424WEST (9378)
> *iNUM:*+883 5100 1420 9001 | *ISN:*410*543 | *Skype:*briankwest
>
>
> --Forwarded Message Attachment--
> From: stuart.mills3 at btopenworld.com
> To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 19:17:34 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Media after hang-up???
>
>  Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> I know for sure this isn’t FreeSWITCH causing the issue, I get the CDR
> posted at the right time and durations are correct, it’s almost as if the
> far end PBX hasn’t noticed the hang-up, even though the BYE does get sent.
>
> My carrier mentioned today (following a full trace from their end) that
> the PBX isn’t sending an ACK to the BYE, does that make any sense given the
> issue I am seeing? My main issue here is if it’s a PBX configuration issue,
> I am unable to look at and diagnose myself, so some sort of starting point
> would be really helpful .
>
> Cheers,
>
> Stuart
>
>  *From:* Michael Jerris <mike at jerris.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 20, 2014 5:25 PM
> *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Media after hang-up???
>
> I have never seen an issue like this, a pcap might tell you more, but i
> seriously doubt we are still sending media after the call hangs up.  I
> would suggest taking a look at a pcap and the debug logs and seeing that
> the call is actually being hung up on the leg facing the pbx and we really
> stop sending media.
>
> Mike
>
>  On Aug 19, 2014, at 8:19 PM, Stuart Mills <stuart.mills3 at btopenworld.com>
> wrote:
>
>   Hi,
>
> I’m experiencing a strange issue calling a destination within the UK,
> whereby media seems to still be connected after hang up.
>
> I only know this as the destination is a PBX, supplied by Unify (formerly
> Siemens), and that PBX on occasions records a voicemail, when a message is
> taken and after the call is hung up, there is a continuous tone heard on
> the end of the recording. The call logs show the right duration and the
> carrier has also confirmed that the call ended as the logs suggest.
>
> So, I’m wondering if anyone else has come across the same sort of issue
> using FreeSWITCH? The end user has told me they never used to experience
> this issue using a different provider, and I can’t reproduce this issue at
> all using other types of PBX, all calls end as they should and voicemail
> recordings end when the call does.
>
> This issue doesn’t seem to be a FreeSWITCH one, just thought it worth an
> ask to the group.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Stuart
>
>
> ------------------------------
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> 
> 
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> 
> 
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20140824/a8d5464c/attachment-0001.html