[Freeswitch-users] high pdd

[Michael Jerris]

Can you compare performance on debian 7?

On Aug 17, 2014, at 2:54 PM, Andre Demattia <andretodd at verizon.net> wrote:

> Yes 64 bit. I've even compiled it in visual studio with the  optimization. Neither makes a difference.
> 
> The server has 40 cores and 128 GB memory. Windows server 2012 r2 datacenter.
> From: Peter Olsson
> Sent: ‎8/‎17/‎2014 2:30 PM
> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] high pdd
> 
> Are you using a 64-bit build?
> 
> 
> 2014-08-17 16:51 GMT+02:00 Andre Demattia <andretodd at verizon.net>:
> Yes that's off and I believe all the databases are off too. No authentication or registration is enabled.  The sizes of the database are 0 until I call the shutdown command then its about 90k.  I have the DBS in Ra drive too.
> 
> Windows seems pretty good until the 3000 sessions per min mark. Then I just get long pdd and the threads get backed up then no more sessions can be created. 
> 
> Funny thing is I has 10 profiles and the same results. I also tried two consoles with the same results.
> 
> FreeSWITCH is great.
> 
> I'd be grateful for help. I've worked on this for 2 years and hate to give up. 
> 
> If any one from consulting at freeswitch.org is willing to help I'd appreciate that.
> 
> Thanks again,
> Andre
> From: Anthony Minessale
> Sent: ‎8/‎17/‎2014 10:13 AM
> To: Freeswitch-users
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] high pdd
> 
> Did you comment out manage-presence ?  Also we have no real idea how well FS performs in windows under extreme load.
> 
> On Aug 17, 2014 5:42 AM, "Andre Demattia" <andretodd at verizon.net> wrote:
> Thanks Ken, I'll try the consulting again.
> Andre
> From: Ken Rice
> Sent: ‎8/‎17/‎2014 1:19 AM
> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] high pdd
> 
> if the last post does not work contact consulting at freeswitch.org for pro help from one of the developers... thats about as far as the list will take you
> 
> Ken
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Aug 16, 2014, at 15:23, "Andre" <andretodd at verizon.net> wrote:
> 
>> Going with the idea it’s IO related I did a db_cache status. I just disabled limit in my code by removing it but limit should be HASH not a database however I stills how a database.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Below is the results of the db cache status. I’m not real sure what its saying. I should have all registration and limit disabled and should not be using any sql database from my understanding.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Anyone know what the results mean? I’ve only tested 2 calls on this status.
>> 
>> 
> 
> [The entire original message is not included.]
]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20140818/40341c9c/attachment-0001.html