[Freeswitch-users] Debian repository out of date

Tue Sep 10 23:07:52 MSD 2013

Blame *Jesse*

From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of
Michael S Collins
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 11:59 AM
To: 'FreeSWITCH Users Help'
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Debian repository out of date

Oh sure, it's all *Jesse's* fault!

From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Ken
Rice
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 11:36 AM
To: FreeSWITCH Users Help
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Debian repository out of date

And YAY the repo has been fixed! We had a little SNAFU in the repo
config with the addition of jesse... Things are back to normal now...
Have at it guys

On 9/10/13 3:51 AM, "Andrew Cassidy" <andrew at cassidywebservices.co.uk>
wrote:

	Ben, what Micheal is talking about (passing patches upstream) is
a prerequisite to what Karl is talking about (getting into the main
Debian repositories)

	We can't do the latter without the former.

	On 9 September 2013 22:32, Ken Rice <krice at freeswitch.org>
wrote:

		Yep and I'm trying to figure out why... Currently
everything is getting rebuilt, but as I said this takes several hours of
processing time to complete and then I will reset the repo

		On 9/9/13 4:21 PM, "Steven Ayre" <steveayre at gmail.com
<http://steveayre@gmail.com> > wrote:

			I see 1.2.12 in the pool, but it isn't listed in
the Packages file so apt doesn't find them.

http://files.freeswitch.org/repo/deb/debian/dists/wheezy/main/binary-amd
64/Packages

			On 9 September 2013 15:39, Ken Rice
<krice at freeswitch.org <http://krice@freeswitch.org> > wrote:

				it is kept up to date in fact its
getting resyned again to make sure its up to date...  however it does
take time for this stuff to build and propogate 

				Ken
				Sent from my iPad

				On Sep 9, 2013, at 7:46, Michael Jerris
<mike at jerris.com <http://mike@jerris.com> > wrote:

				We have no excuses to not keep our repo
up to date.  If this still isn't resolved let me know please.

				Mike

				On Sep 9, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Andrew
Cassidy <andrew at cassidywebservices.co.uk
<http://andrew@cassidywebservices.co.uk> > wrote:

				Indeed, having our own repo is adequate,
but as mentioned earlier, it's not been kept up to date. Because it is a
lot of work even just to maintain what we already have.

				On 9 September 2013 13:12, Michael
Jerris <mike at jerris.com <http://mike@jerris.com> > wrote:

				Thats correct, every time someone comes
around suggesting we get package in the distro repos, I mention this
needs to get done first and if someone wants to do the work on that then
we can discuss what else is necessary to get packages upstream, and them
everyone realizes its a lot of work and wanders off without offering to
help, so it probably will never happen.  I'm not sure it actually adds
any value anyways.

				Mike

				On Sep 9, 2013, at 4:32 AM, Andrew
Cassidy <andrew at cassidywebservices.co.uk
<http://andrew@cassidywebservices.co.uk> > wrote:

Last I heard there were concerns around some of the custom patches to
upstream libraries used in FreeSWITCH that was blocking getting packages
into the official repo?

The other issue is by getting into debian repositories, we're pretty
much obliged to backport security patches between debian releases.

On 8 September 2013 06:39, Gabriel Gunderson <gabe at gundy.org
<http://gabe@gundy.org> > wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Karl Schmidt <karl at xtronics.com
<http://karl@xtronics.com> > wrote:
> On 09/07/2013 04:16 PM, Gabriel Gunderson wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Karl Schmidt <karl at xtronics.com
<http://karl@xtronics.com> > wrote:
>>> My take is 286 packages is too many. Compare it to Apache - lots of
complicated bits can be added
>>> - but the package count isn't even close.
>>
>> Why is that too many? Being granular is a good thing.
>
> I think you are missing my point - Debian will not accept 280 packages
for freeswitch. Ask the
> ftp-masters. The packaging system is not intended to provide
fine-grained granularity.

There was no discussion of Debian accepting packages or not. So, yeah,
I would have missed that point.

> I am quite thankful to the maintainers - and my advice is an attempt
to help them get freeswitch
> into Debian.

They're making lots of progress in this area. Of course, any help is
welcomed.

Best,
Gabe

________________________________________________________________________
_
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting at freeswitch.org <http://consulting@freeswitch.org> 
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com <http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com/>

 </> 

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org <http://www.freeswitch.org/> 
http://wiki.freeswitch.org <http://wiki.freeswitch.org/> 
http://www.cluecon.com <http://www.cluecon.com/> 

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
<http://FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> 
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org <http://www.freeswitch.org/> 

-- 
Ken
http://www.FreeSWITCH.org
http://www.ClueCon.com
http://www.OSTAG.org
irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20130910/63168038/attachment-0001.html 