[Freeswitch-users] RRC7007 sucks!

[Andrew Cassidy]

All this really means is a stack can claim to be RFC7007 compliant without
being RFC3551 complaint by not supporting DVI4. Equally, RFC3551 compliance
implies RFC7007 compliance because there are no additions.


On 4 September 2013 16:59, Steve Underwood <steveu at coppice.org> wrote:

> Darn it. We added the DVI ADPCM codec to FS, just so we could say we are
> one of the very very few RTP platforms which are actually RFC3551
> compliant, and now RFC7007 has removed the requirement.
>
> Steve
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> 
> 
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>



-- 
*Andrew Cassidy BSc (Hons) MBCS SSCA*
Managing Director


*T <info at cassidywebservices.co.uk> *03300 100 960
*F<info at cassidywebservices.co.uk>
 *03300 100 961
*E <info at cassidywebservices.co.uk> *andrew at cassidywebservices.co.uk
*W <info at cassidywebservices.co.uk> *www.cassidywebservices.co.uk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20130904/63f1c78b/attachment.html