[Freeswitch-users] Best practices for parallel fork with redirect on one branch

[DanB]

Hey Guys,

Have met a situation where I need to do parallel call forking with 
bridge application and on one of the legs will receive a 302 which could 
mean another parallel fork there.

Have tested the following scenarios:

1. Sip profile with manual-redirect=true.

Here I fork the call using bridge with "," as separator and parallel 
fork works.
The issue is that as soon as one of my forked legs receives 302, the 
other will be cancelled also and 302 will be handled further in it's 
context. Is this the expected behaviour from bridge?
Question here: should  it drop one branch of the parallel fork if other 
is receiving redirect?

2. Sip profile with manual-redirect=false, leaving mod_sofia doing the 
handling of the redirect.

After I fork the call here with bridge, only the leg which receives 302 
will be redirected which is the expected behaviour by me.
The issue I have here is that I do not know how to influence mod_sofia 
to handle parallel forking out of 302 and not very obvious out of the 
documentation I have digged so far (I receive 2 contacts in redirect btw 
which I would like to fork also here).
Question here: may I specify the type of fork mod_sofia should do in 
some way?

Thanks in advance for any tip!

DanB

PS: Logs available at request if needed.