[Freeswitch-users] centos/rhel rpms not signed for 1.2.14 ?

[Ivan]

Hi there,

Did something change with how rpm packages are signed ? Yum complains 
that the 1.2.14 packages are not signed, which is indeed the case.

1.2.12 was OK:

$rpm -K freeswitch-1.2.12-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
freeswitch-1.2.12-1.el6.x86_64.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 gpg OK

1.2.14 is not (missing gpg/dsa flags):

$rpm -K freeswitch-1.2.14-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
freeswitch-1.2.14-1.el6.x86_64.rpm: sha1 md5 OK

I was waiting to see if other people had this problem - it's already 10 
days since the rpms are available, so either I'm doing something wrong, 
or people don't care about package signing (bad!). The yum repo release 
rpm is set up with gpgcheck=1 but the wiki mentions using "--nogpgcheck" 
[1].  What's the "official" policy ?

cheers

ivan

[1] http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Download_%26_Installation_Guide