[Freeswitch-users] sofia's SLA confusing caller_profiles

[Vik Killa]

im may be wrong about this but it is confusing.... when an outbound call
(B-leg) is "stolen" via SLA (sofia's intercept, meaning that A-leg pushes
hold and a new leg, C-leg, is created when another phone hit's the line key
to bridge to the B-leg) the B-leg's caller_profile contains an
originator_caller_profile of the new C-leg's caller_profile and the C-leg's
caller_profile contains an originatee_caller_profile of B-leg's
caller_profile

this seems counter-intuitive and backwards compared to how it functions in
all other scenarios

shouldn't the original B-leg have an originatee_caller_profile and the new
C-leg have an originator_caller_profile?

since the C-leg is the NEW leg, it should have an originator, no? and since
the B-leg already exists, it should have an originatee?

Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20131003/98fe6831/attachment.html