[Freeswitch-users] CHANNEL_HANGUP vs CHANNEL_HANGUP_COMPLETE

[Michael Jerris]

If you are writing a cdr module, you should be using the on_reporting state handler, not the event handler for hangup complete.

Mike

On May 29, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Dave R. Kompel <drk at drkngs.net> wrote:

> Also worth noting, CHANNEL_HANGUP_COMPLETE is the event you use to write CDRs if you're going to do your own CDR module, or do it external.
>  
> --Dave
> 
> From: Anthony Minessale [mailto:anthony.minessale at gmail.com]
> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help [mailto:freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org]
> Sent: Wed, 29 May 2013 11:19:02 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] CHANNEL_HANGUP vs CHANNEL_HANGUP_COMPLETE
> 
> Hangup is when it hangs up, hangup_complete is after the cdr processing is complete right before destroy.
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Tihomir Culjaga <tculjaga at gmail.com> wrote:
> hello
> 
> 
> im wondering what should we track as hangup event ... CHANNEL_HANGUP or CHANNEL_HANGUP_COMPLETE ...
> 
> i have a situation where A calls FS, an ESL application answers this call, originates a new call to B and bridges A and B... than ESL originate another call towards C and joins all 3 channels into a conference.
> 
> now , A hangs up, FS sends just CHANNEL_HANGUP event ... not CHANNEL_HANGUP_COMPLETE ...
> 
> 
> im wondering if it is supposed to be like that or we need to get CHANNEL_HANGUP_COMPLETE ?
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20130529/a4b7adeb/attachment.html