[Freeswitch-users] SaltStack + deployment techniques

[Henry Huang]

It's the first time I hear about SaltStack. Can you briefly explain why is
it better than Puppet or Chef. I would pick Chef out of the 2 because it's
using Ruby natively and is being adapted by Amazon AWS. So if you ever need
some kind of hybrid architecture to run production or development servers
on AWS, you will spend minimal effort for deploying those given that you
can reuse your Chef cookbooks.

Henry


On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Gabriel Gunderson <gabe at gundy.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
> <cal.leeming at simplicitymedialtd.co.uk> wrote:
> > I'm still not entirely happy with the overall procedure and always
> looking
> > for new/better ways to improve it.. but SaltStack is a clear winner,
> leaving
> > puppet/chef in it's dust.
>
> Sounds like you're getting close to being happy :)
>
> When we do some Salt Modules and States specific to OpenSIP and
> FreeSWITCH, we'll be sure to open source them.
>
> Happy hacking!
>
>
> Gabe
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> 
> 
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20130313/e8984d2d/attachment.html