[Freeswitch-users] Debian packaging - some questions

[Steven Ayre]

>
> You may not have noticed there are meta packages.  If you install
> freeswitch-meta-all you'll get everything pulled in.


You can also build your own meta package that depends on all the packages
required by your application. Then it's simply a case of:
$ sudo apt-get install freeswitch-meta-companyname

-Steve



On 12 March 2013 15:28, Travis Cross <tc at travislists.com> wrote:

> Hi Cal,
>
> It looks like others did rather well at answering these, so I'll just
> fill in some points.
>
> On 2013-03-12 12:44, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] wrote:
> > So today I went to go and create a Debian package for FreeSWITCH
> > using the existing packaging structure;
> >
> > https://github.com/traviscross/freeswitch/blob/master/debian/
> > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Debian_packages_buildscript
> >
> > The first problem is that neither the helper or the debian/ dir have
> > been configured for compatibility with pbuilder, which makes it
> > untidy/non-sane to place this onto an automated production build
> > system (it also impacts security slightly due to untrusted external
> > code being ran outside of a chroot - but that's possibly an entirely
> > different debate).
>
> It works fine with pbuilder and cowbuilder.  If you take a look at the
> util.sh script, which is what I use to do the builds, you'll see I use
> cowbuilder there as well.
>
> > The second problem is that the build resulted in nearly 100
> > different *.deb files This also poses somewhat of an annoyance in
> > automated deployment environments, for example saltstack, where the
> > configuration would have to list each individual FreeSWITCH
> > module.
>
> You may not have noticed there are meta packages.  If you install
> freeswitch-meta-all you'll get everything pulled in.
>
> > It also feels very untidy. I understand that certain packages (such
> > as libfreeswitch, libfreeswitch-dev, freeswitch-server etc) should
> > be separated. But having a package for each module, the only use I
> > could think of for this, would be if the Debian package compiles
> > absolutely every module possible, and is then linked dynamically,
> > rather than compiled static. This means enabling/disabling modules
> > would be a matter of simply adding/removing a package.
>
> Yes, that's exactly how it works.
>
> > However I'm not entirely convinced if this is what it is
> > doing.. when compiling absolutely every package possible, FreeSWITCH
> > will usually fail to compile, due to collision etc.
> >
> > So I have a couple of questions;
> >
> > 1) Why are the modules separated into individual files?
> >
> > 2) Are there any reasons to not be using pbuilder?
> >
> > I have also CC'd Travis Cross who appears to a major contributor on
> > the Debian packaging code.
>
> Please also be sure to read debian/README.{Debian,source}.
>
> Best,
>
> --
> Travis Cross
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> 
> 
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20130312/13023bc9/attachment.html