[Freeswitch-users] High cps load causes weird cpu and memory starvation. Need suggestions on how to debug.
bratner bratner
ratner2 at gmail.com
Fri Mar 8 19:22:07 MSK 2013
The original test was done on git master at the date mentioned. The sqlite
core.db file was on /run/shm which is a tmpfs on unbuntu 12.04.
I will be recompiling from git master and test running with -nosql.
Testing my existing setup with -nosql seems more stable now running at
210CPS for some time (500k calls already passed) with ~35% idle cpu.
But the free mem is slowly going down. I will let it run untill the kernel
will kill it to see how many calls it can handle.
During my tests i did not run FS with RT priority but according to htop
some of the threads are scheduled as RT.
My setup is doing bypass-media , thus FS handling only call establishment
and teardown on both legs.
cat /proc/<FS pid>/status
Name: freeswitch
State: S (sleeping)
Tgid: 15995
Pid: 15995
PPid: 1
TracerPid: 0
Uid: 999 999 999 999
Gid: 999 999 999 999
FDSize: 64
Groups:
VmPeak: 5002808 kB
VmSize: 5002088 kB
VmLck: 0 kB
VmPin: 0 kB
VmHWM: 625900 kB
VmRSS: 624156 kB <-- this is going up
VmData: 4855788 kB
VmStk: 136 kB
VmExe: 20 kB
VmLib: 18288 kB
VmPTE: 2352 kB
VmSwap: 0 kB
Threads: 1866
SigQ: 0/18446744073709551615
SigPnd: 0000000000000000
ShdPnd: 0000000000000000
SigBlk: 0000000000000000
SigIgn: 0000000010003006
SigCgt: 0000000180014209
CapInh: 0000000000000000
CapPrm: 0000000000000000
CapEff: 0000000000000000
CapBnd: ffffffffffffffff
Cpus_allowed: ffffff
Cpus_allowed_list: 0-23
Mems_allowed: 00000000,00000003
Mems_allowed_list: 0-1
voluntary_ctxt_switches: 1803
nonvoluntary_ctxt_switches: 23
output of 'top -H' at 180CPS
top - 15:27:00 up 2 days, 5:32, 5 users, load average: 8.19, 91.07, 65.03
Tasks: 2066 total, 3 running, 2063 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 50.1%us, 3.9%sy, 0.0%ni, 45.9%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.2%si,
0.0%st
Mem: 4038512k total, 2282260k used, 1756252k free, 114112k buffers
Swap: 0k total, 0k used, 0k free, 1165868k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+
COMMAND
16000 freeswit RT -10 4885m 594m 4964 R 69 15.1 3:10.26
freeswitch
16009 freeswit RT -10 4885m 594m 4964 S 33 15.1 1:26.20
freeswitch
16008 freeswit RT -10 4885m 594m 4964 S 28 15.1 1:17.30
freeswitch
16007 freeswit RT -10 4885m 594m 4964 S 4 15.1 0:10.80
freeswitch
16004 freeswit RT -10 4885m 594m 4964 S 2 15.1 0:06.63
freeswitch
19171 root 20 0 18988 2948 944 R 2 0.1 0:00.64
top
18735 freeswit -2 -10 4885m 594m 4964 S 1 15.1 0:00.29
freeswitch
16003 freeswit -2 -10 4885m 594m 4964 S 1 15.1 0:01.61
freeswitch
16690 freeswit -2 -10 4885m 594m 4964 S 1 15.1 0:00.42
freeswitch
16730 freeswit -2 -10 4885m 594m 4964 S 1 15.1 0:00.42
freeswitch
16750 freeswit -2 -10 4885m 594m 4964 S 1 15.1 0:00.45
freeswitch
16764 freeswit -2 -10 4885m 594m 4964 S 1 15.1 0:00.44
freeswitch
<more of the above>
....
....
Thanks to all of you ,
Boris Ratner.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Dmitry Lysenko <dvl36.ripe.nick at gmail.com>wrote:
> I can't reproduce such cps load on my ARMv5TE system. )
> bratner, please give us 'top -H'. I guess freeswitch running at realtime
> priority.
>
>
> 2013/3/8 Ken Rice <krice at freeswitch.org>
>
>> Sqlite is probably getting hammered... Trust me... Mount the fs db dir
>> as tmpfs or use the –nosql flag when starting freeswitch
>>
>> I routinely run dialer traffic at much higher CPS then that
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/7/13 7:58 PM, "Dmitry Lysenko" <dvl36.ripe.nick at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> bi, bo and wa field is low, so it seems that is not disk subsystem.
>>
>>
>> 2013/3/8 Ken Rice <krice at freeswitch.org>
>>
>> You are probably hammering the disk subsystem... Keep in mind that FS
>> uses multiple sqlite databases by default... Mount the fs db dir as tmpfs
>> and try again
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/7/13 7:35 PM, "Dmitry Lysenko" <dvl36.ripe.nick at gmail.com <
>> http://dvl36.ripe.nick@gmail.com> > wrote:
>>
>> Hm... But what about huge interrupt and context switching number?
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> _________________________________________________________________________
>> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
>> consulting at freeswitch.org
>> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
>> http://www.cluecon.com
>>
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ken
>> *http://www.FreeSWITCH.org
>> http://www.ClueCon.com
>> http://www.OSTAG.org
>> *irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________________
>> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
>> consulting at freeswitch.org
>> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
>> http://www.cluecon.com
>>
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
>
>
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20130308/22d0487f/attachment.html
Join us at ClueCon 2011 Aug 9-11, 2011
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list