[Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH adds WebRTC support to new 1.4 BETA.

[Steven Ayre]

Yes, but there's a big difference between SIP over TCP and SIP over
Websocket over TCP. :)

Technically I'm guessing the TCP and WS transports share the same TCP port
bind? That in itself would be a good reason why it shouldn't be a separate
profile. Technically impossible to have different profiles handling
different transports on the same port.

Anyway the point was profiles are linked to a ip:port rather than a
specific transport.




On Thursday, June 27, 2013, Vik Killa wrote:

> Doesn't WS work OVER TCP?
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Steven Ayre <steveayre at gmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'steveayre at gmail.com');>
> > wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> We already have profiles binding to both UDP and TCP - why not WS too? :)
>>
>> -Steve
>>
>>
> <snip>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20130630/98ce4288/attachment.html