[Freeswitch-users] att_xfer question

[João Mesquita]

This sort of call swapping is not implemented on the source code. I was one
of the guys that wanted this type of feature implemented on the core
instead of on the endpoint modules or endpoints itself and I have to say
that once you understand the code you understand why it is not supposed to
be there. I now advocate to completely remove the feature because it causes
only headaches and make you look for a solution in the wrong place.

So, to the real question, why are you using att_xfer? I am still waiting
for a valid use case.

Regards,
JM

João Mesquita
FreeSWITCH™ Solutions


On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Stuart Mills <stuart.mills3 at btopenworld.com
> wrote:

>   Hi all,
>
> I have a question which is hopefully not too complicated.
>
> I’m playing with mid call transfer features, I have an extension in
> features.conf to do the MCT which works fine, a_leg connects to the b_leg,
> then b_leg transfer to destination c_leg and can talk.
>
> My question is this, is it then easy for b_leg to toggle the call between
> a_leg and c_leg, I take it it’s just another feature extension that bridges
> calls between the 2 legs, could it be that simple?
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Stuart Mills
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> 
> 
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20130626/988d26a1/attachment.html