[Freeswitch-users] origin/master's HEAD is segfaulting
Ken Rice
krice at freeswitch.org
Sat Jun 22 20:32:04 MSD 2013
Oh come on people... Jira... That's where you report bugs... And yes a
segfault is a bug
On 6/22/13 9:03 AM, "arif hossain" <aftnix at live.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm on this commit :
> arif at khost:~/src/freeswitch$ git show HEAD
> commit f8122e39c51240b99bf07a767afe2f8a698f1486
>
> Now its segfaulting on startup.
>
>> From generated core :
>
> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> #0 0x00007f245cc28df1 in su_casematch (s1=0x7f245cc7fc57 "",
> s2=0x3000000030 <Address 0x3000000030 out of bounds>) at su_string.c:224
> 224 unsigned char a = *s1++, b = *s2++;
>
> Clearly s2 is wrongly initialized.
>
> The backtrace :
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x00007f245cc28df1 in su_casematch (s1=0x7f245cc7fc57 "",
> s2=0x3000000030 <Address 0x3000000030 out of bounds>) at su_string.c:224
> #1 0x00007f245cc377ff in tport_server_addrinfo (mr=0x7f243c003c30,
> canon=0x7f243c003bfe "[::1]", family=0, host=0x7f245c958670 "::1",
> service=0x7f243c003c04 "5060", protocol=0x7f245cc7fc56 "*",
> transports=0x7f245c9589c0, return_addrinfo=0x7f245c958608) at tport.c:1814
> #2 0x00007f245cc370a1 in tport_bind_server (mr=0x7f243c003c30,
> tpn=0x7f245c958770, transports=0x7f245c9589c0, public=tport_type_local,
> tags=0x7f245c958730) at tport.c:1652
> #3 0x00007f245cc36762 in tport_tbind (self=0x7f243c003c30,
> tpn=0x7f245c958a50, transports=0x7f245c9589c0,
> tag=0x7f245cecae20 <tptag_ident>, value=139794152182707) at tport.c:1524
> #4 0x00007f245cb8882d in nta_agent_add_tport (self=0x7f243c001e40,
> uri=0x7f24400099c0, tag=0x7f245cecae20 <tptag_ident>,
> value=139794152182707) at nta.c:2237
> #5 0x00007f245cbc4e71 in nua_stack_init_transport (nua=0x7f2440007970,
> tags=0x7f24400098f0) at nua_register.c:1216
> #6 0x00007f245cbd6b6b in nua_stack_init (root=0x7f243c001130,
> nua=0x7f2440007970) at nua_stack.c:194
> #7 0x00007f245cc24441 in su_pthread_port_clone_main (varg=0x7f245c9d03d0)
> at su_pthread_port.c:340
> #8 0x00007f2460ffae9a in start_thread ()
> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
> ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
> #9 0x00007f2460d27ccd in clone () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
> #10 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>
>
> In tport_server_addrinfo() :
>
> (gdb) list tport_server_addrinfo
> ...
> 1800 char const * const transports[],
> ...
> ...
> 1811 for (i = 0, N = 0; transports[i] && N < TPORT_N; i++) {
> 1812 su_addrinfo_t *ai = &hints[N];
> 1813
> 1814 if (!su_casematch(protocol, transports[i]) &&
> !su_strmatch(protocol, "*"))
>
> So char const * const transports[] is not correctly initialized before using
> its values in the for loop.
>
> (gdb) p transports[0]
> $3 = 0x3000000030 <Address 0x3000000030 out of bounds>
> (gdb) p transports[1]
> $4 = 0x7f245c958d00 "`\215\225\\$\177"
>
> So transports[0] is the problematic initialization here.
>
> Going back further, in libs/sofia-sip/libsofia-sip-ua/nta/nta.c: 2150
>
> char const * const * tports = tports_sip;
>
> And here
>
> (gdb) ptype tports_sip
> type = const char * const[5]
> (gdb) p tports_sip[0]
> $6 = 0x7f245cc7fc38 "udp"
> (gdb) p tports[0]
> $7 = 0x3000000030 <Address 0x3000000030 out of bounds>
> (gdb) ptype tports_sip
> type = const char * const[5]
> (gdb) p tports
> $11 = (const char * const *) 0x7f245c9589c0
> (gdb) p &tports_sip
> $12 = (const char * const(*)[5]) 0x7f245cebf660 <tports_sip>
>
> As it can be seen, tports diverged from initial tports_sip.
> It has been done in following snippet :
>
> 2197 if (strchr(tp, ',')) {
> 2198 int i; char *t, *tps[9] = {0};
> 2199
> 2200 /* Split tp into transports */
> 2201 for (i = 0, t = tp; t && i < 8; i++) {
> 2202 tps[i] = t;
> 2203 if ((t = strchr(t, ',')))
> 2204 *t++ = '\0';
> 2205 }
> 2206
> 2207 tps[i] = NULL;
> 2208 tports = (char const * const *)tps;
>
>
> Now :
>
> (gdb) p tp
> $20 = "udp\000tcp\000H\215\225\\$\177\000\000\240\252\354\\"..
>
> So above code should parse "udp" in tports[0]. Which is not the case here.
>
> I'm assuming this bug has to generated from a more higher level, rather than
> happened in a file which has not been touched since 2006( I git blamed it).
>
> But bt does not have any calls to "non-sofia" stuff.
>
> This su_casematch() was called from two threads,
>
> 4 Thread 0x7f245eccb700 (LWP 7622) 0x00007f245cc28df1 in su_casematch (
> s1=0x7f245cc7fc57 "", s2=0x3000000030 <Address 0x3000000030 out of
> bounds>)
> at su_string.c:224
>
> * 1 Thread 0x7f245c959700 (LWP 7623) 0x00007f245cc28df1 in su_casematch (
> s1=0x7f245cc7fc57 "", s2=0x3000000030 <Address 0x3000000030 out of
> bounds>)
> at su_string.c:224
>
>
> Both calls to su_casematch seems problematic.
>
> Sorry for a long BUGREPORT. Actually i thought i should post my investigation
> if it helps the devs(After git blaming, i highly suspect that my investigation
> unearthed nothing , problem generated from elsewhere, which i could not find).
>
> I've not started git bisecting. If it helps, i will be happy to do that.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers
> arif
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
>
>
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
--
Ken
http://www.FreeSWITCH.org
http://www.ClueCon.com
http://www.OSTAG.org
irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
Join us at ClueCon 2011 Aug 9-11, 2011
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list