[Freeswitch-users] FS Choking on a 200 Response w/ a Duplicate "From" Header

[JP]

Yes, good question. But it looks like OpenSER is inserting the duplicate
>From header and the RFC specifically does not say that this is illegal.

-JP


On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Ken Rice <krice at freeswitch.org> wrote:

>  Is 2 From headers even technically allow?
>
>
> On 6/5/13 2:03 PM, "JP" <jaykris at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I thought I would bounce this off the mailing list before filing a Jira
> ticket.
>
> I'm facing an issue where FS doesn't acknowledge a 200 OK response with a
> duplicate "From" header:
>
> recv 422 bytes from udp/[10.191.210.149]:5060 at 17:21:22.634270:
>    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    SIP/2.0 200 OK
>    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.191.210.147:5080;rport;branch=z9hG4bKNv1g56Djj6BKj
>    From: "" <sip:0000000000 at 10.191.210.147 <
> mailto:sip%3A0000000000 at 10.191.210.147 <sip%3A0000000000 at 10.191.210.147>>
> >;tag=By8FpSr2m6NvF
>    From: "" <sip:0000000000 at 10.191.210.147 <
> mailto:sip%3A0000000000 at 10.191.210.147 <sip%3A0000000000 at 10.191.210.147>>
> >;tag=By8FpSr2m6NvF
>    To: <sip:1000 at 10.191.210.149:5060 <http://sip:1000@10.191.210.149:5060>
> >;tag=1
>
>    Call-ID: 1efaef87-48a7-1231-d08a-000c29ccde0a
>    CSeq: 44890363 INVITE
>    Contact: <sip:10.191.210.149:5060;transport=UDP>
>    Content-Type: application/sdp
>    Content-Length: 0
>
> Although I've not yet stepped through the code, it is my suspicion that
> the Sofia SIP stack is not accepting the response.  Aside from the
> re-transmissions of the response that I'm seeing in the logs, there are no
> other error, info, or trace statements coming from any other FS module.
> RFC 3261 seems a bit vague in my opinion as to whether or not this is even
> allowed.
>
> As a side note, this issue came up while doing integration testing with
> OpenSER 1.3.4.  OpenSER seems to stick in the duplicate From header
> whenever it does a serial proxy to multiple carriers and the first carrier
> leg times out.  I'm wondering if anyone on the mailing list was familiar
> with this issue and perhaps knew of some fix/workaround on the FreeSWITCh
> end.
>
> Thanks,
>
> JP
>
> ------------------------------
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> 
> 
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
> --
> Ken
> *http://www.FreeSWITCH.org
> http://www.ClueCon.com
> http://www.OSTAG.org
> *irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> 
> 
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20130605/09a02443/attachment.html