[Freeswitch-users] Call Recovery when using TCP

[Gilad Abada]

Hi Anthony, 

call recovery is only possible with UDP. 

-- 


On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Anthony McGarry wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> FreeSWITCH (Version 1.2.11 git c9790ea 2013-07-16 02:46:21Z)
> 
> I have two physical boxes active/passive using heartbeat and corosync.
> Using FS as an SBC with two profiles. Internal and Private. 
> Both profiles are using track-calls for call recovery.
> 
> Works fine when using UDP as the transport for both legs.
> Works fine when A leg uses UDP and B leg uses TCP
> Fails when A leg uses TCP and b leg uses either UDP or TCP.
> 
> It seems that the A leg always uses UDP as the transport for the INVITE to recover. Even if the initial call used TCP before the failure.
> 
> Anyone using TCP in this scenario? Cannot find what I'm missing.
> 
> Thanks
> A
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org (mailto:consulting at freeswitch.org)
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
> 
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org (mailto:FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org)
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20130723/caf6920e/attachment-0001.html