[Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH adds WebRTC support to new 1.4 BETA.

[João Mesquita]

Steven, that is incorrect. WS is another parameter on the sofia profile and
therefore, you can have WS enabled but not TCP and vice-versa.

Regards,
JM

João Mesquita
FreeSWITCH™ Solutions


On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Steven Ayre <steveayre at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, but there's a big difference between SIP over TCP and SIP over
> Websocket over TCP. :)
>
> Technically I'm guessing the TCP and WS transports share the same TCP port
> bind? That in itself would be a good reason why it shouldn't be a separate
> profile. Technically impossible to have different profiles handling
> different transports on the same port.
>
> Anyway the point was profiles are linked to a ip:port rather than a
> specific transport.
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, June 27, 2013, Vik Killa wrote:
>
>> Doesn't WS work OVER TCP?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Steven Ayre <steveayre at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> We already have profiles binding to both UDP and TCP - why not WS too?
>>> :)
>>>
>>> -Steve
>>>
>>>
>> <snip>
>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> 
> 
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20130630/6abc84c9/attachment.html