[Freeswitch-users] Unloop extension

[Michael Collins]

Yes, it's okay. The pre-process does a set and ${unroll_loops} gets set as
needed. Then this dp entry does the work:
    <extension name="unloop">
      <condition field="${unroll_loops}" expression="^true$"/>
      <condition field="${sip_looped_call}" expression="^true$">
        <action application="deflect" data="${destination_number}"/>
      </condition>
    </extension>

More info on sip_looped_call var:
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Variable_sip_looped_call

-MC

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Ержан Тулепов <e.tylepov at btcom.kz> wrote:

> What unloop extension is used for? BTW: vars.xml pre-(process)-sets
> unroll_loops, whereas DPs (public and default) are using channel variable
> syntax? Is this ok?
>
> Y.
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> 
> 
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>



-- 
Michael S Collins
Twitter: @mercutioviz
http://www.FreeSWITCH.org
http://www.ClueCon.com
http://www.OSTAG.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20130115/7f51cecf/attachment-0001.html