[Freeswitch-users] freeswitch continously sending sip update-messages: why?

[Michel Brabants]

Hello,

this is disabled in all profiles, but freeswitch keeps sending updates. I'm
adding my profile-config here. I even added it to the gateway that is
associated with the endpoint, which may be important .... The endpoint is a
B2B sipserver itself, so I was wondering if this could be the problem ...

I made some progress: when adding the following to the gateway-declaration,
calls are disconnected after a minute (bit more), because after about 30
seconds freeswitch starts sending updates now ... This is really strange. I
added the following to the gateway-settings to make calls atleast reach 1
minute:

 <variables>
    <variable name="send-display-update" value="false" direction="inbound"/>
  </variables>

Why isn't freeswitch taking the param from the ua/profile that is
associated with the profile?


Thanks,

Michel

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Michael Jerris <mike at jerris.com> wrote:

> Its to update the caller id information.  you can disable this:
>
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia.conf.xml#send-display-update
>
> Mike
>
> On Jan 9, 2013, at 4:48 AM, Michel Brabants <michel.brabants at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> No, freeswitch is not getting a response as the client (B2B sipserver)
> converts this to a reinvite with no sdp (which is incorrect of course).
> However, if I need to wait in the client-developers to fix this, I'll be a
> half year further...
>
> I was wondering however why freeswitch is sending these in the first place
> as it contains no differences from previous sdp's. It isn't also sending
> updates or reinvites to the other side. I don't see the purpose of these
> updates. If it was to change the code, ... it would be better in this case
> as freeswitch could send reinvites instead as these wouldn't be handled
> incorrectly normally by the client.
>
>
> Michel
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Steven Ayre <steveayre at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yep my mistake... rather I meant is FS getting a response?
>> (Wondering if FS is retransmitting and/or timing out the call on no
>> response since you say it hangs up 30s later)
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8 January 2013 20:46, Kristian Kielhofner <kris at kriskinc.com> wrote:
>> > The correct positive response to an UPDATE would be a 200 that is then
>> > ACKd.  See RFC 3311:
>> >
>> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3311
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Steven Ayre <steveayre at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> Does the client send an ACK for the UPDATE?
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> 
> 
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20130109/e64a32e0/attachment.html