[Freeswitch-users] NPDI tel URI parameters appearing in SIP URI

[Avi Marcus]

You'll have to use a regex and capture it manually.
See:
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Regular_Expression#LNP_.28Local_Number_Portability.29

-Avi

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Victor Chukalovskiy <
victor.chukalovskiy at gmail.com> wrote:

>  Hello,
>
> SIP call comes on leg A as following:
> INVITE sip:6135555555*;npdi=yes*@1.2.3.4:5060 SIP/2.0
>
> ${destination_number} var becomes "6135555555;npdi=yes"
>
> On leg B I send the call to gateway using unaltered ${destination_number}:
> <action application="bridge"
> data="sofia/gateway/test_gw/${destination_number}"/>
>
> I see the following on leg B:
> INVITE sip:6135555555 at 5.6.7.8:5060*;npdi=yes* SIP/2.0
>
> So, FS moved ";npdi=yes" which is a tel URI parameter into the very end as
> if it was a SIP URI parameter. Such behavior does not seem correct. Is this
> a bug? Found the following implementation discussion:
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.sip-implementors/21554
>
> Please help to make FS send tel URI parameters unaltered using bridge
> application and a gateway. WiKi for bridge dial-plan tool has some examples
> but it does not make use of gateway and I need to use gateway.
>
> Thank you,
> Victor
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> 
> 
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20130220/2901ebb3/attachment.html