[Freeswitch-users] How to refuse T.38 requests

[Ali Pey]

200 OK is a proper respond in this scenario as FS did receive the Update
for an existing SIP session. Codec negotiation is a different story and is
negotiated through SDP (Offer/Answer).

If FS responds with a 4XX response code, the call would very likely be
dropped which probably be a less desired outcome.

Regards,
Ali Pey



On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:04 PM, gegetel <geo.cherchetout at laposte.net>wrote:

> Le 30/12/2013 15:48, *Ali Pey* wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > As you can see, the 200 OK message to the Update does not include t.38.
> So,
> > this would be a bug on your service provider if they continue to do t.38.
>
> I saw this message does not include t.38 and whas suspecting my provider's
> behaviour to be wrong. Now I am sure.
> But is "OK" the best answer to an *only t.38* request ? Is not there a way
> to have FreeSwitch rejecting more firmly such a request ?
>
> > Almost all service providers have the ability to turn off t.38 per
> account.
> > I'd suggest you talk to your service provider.
>
> OK, I am preparing a complaint with, now, one more strong argument. Not
> sure
> to be proved right because I am a very small customer...
>
> Thank you very much for your answer.
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> 
> 
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20131230/a778b6d3/attachment-0001.html