[Freeswitch-users] CONFIG_HZ=1000 vs mod_timerfd -- preferred approach

[Jayanth Acharya]

I didn't mean to say: "... By default neither of those 2 seem to be
true...."
but rather: "...By default neither of those 2 are enabled..."


On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Jayanth Acharya <jayachar88 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Thanks Jeff. Reading the mod_timerfd wiki page, I see that there are 2
> approaches to using timerfd,
>
> 1. Using the loadable module i.e. mod_timerfd (requiring me to build this
> module and then ensure it is loaded)
> 2. Using the support of timerfd now available in FS core itself (requiring
> me to just enable it in the switch.conf file)
>
> By default neither of those 2 seem to be true. I am on what as the Git
> HEAD last week - 22nd Aug 2013, so pretty recent source. However, it when I
> adopted the 2nd approach, i.e. enable timerfd use in FS core, by enabling
> the config in switch.conf, it didn't have the desired effect. Perhaps
> indicating that my problems might not be limited to just the timer
> resolution !!
>
> Using the method described here:
> http://www.advenage.com/topics/linux-timer-interrupt-frequency.php
>
> I tested and found that on my FS machine, the timer resolution available
> is already pretty good -- in the ~3KHz range, so shouldn't be an issue, if
> FS core is indeed correctly using timerfd.
>
> ---
> kernel timer interrupt frequency is approx. 3401 Hz
> jayachar at dabbian1:~$ ./timer_resolution_test
> kernel timer interrupt frequency is approx. 3401 Hz
> jayachar at dabbian1:~$ ./timer_resolution_test
> kernel timer interrupt frequency is approx. 3448 Hz
> jayachar at dabbian1:~$ ./timer_resolution_test
> kernel timer interrupt frequency is approx. 3021 Hz
> jayachar at dabbian1:~$ ./timer_resolution_test
> kernel timer interrupt frequency is approx. 3067 Hz
> ---
>
> I have already check that my kernel has the TIMERFD option enabled in the
> build, which explains (perhaps) the ~3KHz resolution I see.
>
> So the question now is, is FS really using the timerfd logic in it's core
> properly, or do I need to try the mod_timerfd method as well !! (That's a
> rhetorical question... I will go ahead and try anyway, disabling the FS
> core option to use timerfd, as per the Wiki).
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Jeff Leung <jleung at v10networks.ca>wrote:
>
>> If I can recall correctly, timerfd will be used automatically regardless
>> in recent versions of FreeSWITCH if it’s available.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:
>> freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Jayanth
>> Acharya
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 28, 2013 9:35 PM
>> *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help
>> *Subject:* [Freeswitch-users] CONFIG_HZ=1000 vs mod_timerfd -- preferred
>> approach****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Assuming that one has full control over the kernel configuration and FS
>> build / config options, is there a preferred mechanism between the 2 for
>> letting FS have access to high resolution timers, i.e.****
>>
>>    - CONFIG_HZ=1000****
>>    - mod_timerfd****
>>
>> This was one step I missed in my FS setup, and I think it might explain
>> the extremely choppy, broken, garbled announcement I hear when I call into
>> my gsmopen EP via phone.****
>>
>> J****
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________________
>> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
>> consulting at freeswitch.org
>> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>>
>> 
>> 
>>
>> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
>> http://www.cluecon.com
>>
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20130829/90899f59/attachment-0001.html