[Freeswitch-users] ReloadXML takes very long time

[Yiftach Golan]

You may be able to develop it as well but it will not solve our problem of
pushing configuration fast
We have a front end that pushes the configuration changes and it needs to
be fast, so even if we change it in the background it will be slow

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Puskás Zsolt <errotan at elder.hu> wrote:

>
> I'm not an expert ( correct me if I'm wrong ) but I suppose the xml config
> memory section is locked while the files are proccessed so other modules
> are waiting for it. Instead of loading just one file you could continue to
> load all the files into somekind of a new temporary config section without
> locking the main. Once the files are loaded and processed the temporary and
> main section could be swapped or the temporary is used and the other is
> deleted from memory. No idea how many time this could take to implement.
>
>
> 2012-10-23 02:56 keltezéssel, Yiftach Golan írta:
>
> Hi FreeSWITCH community,
> My name is Yiftah and I am working for ChooChee which is a hosted PBX
> solution company
> We have been using FreeSWITCH for almost 2 years and we added a lot of
> code changes to the core and to the different modules
> Lately we have made a decision to get more close to the community so that
> we can enjoy the bug fixes and the new feature from the community and we
> can contribute our knowledge and bug fixes
> I would please like to start with a very basic question :
> We are using dialplan xmls in order to load the configuration, we have a
> lot of users on each freeswitch (+4k), it took a very long time for the
> configuration to load (around 5 minutes) during this time no new calls
> could be served by FreeSWITCH
> In order to solve this problem we introduce reload xml that accepts file
> names and has the ability to load just one file name into the memory (we
> achieved 10ms loading time instead of 5 minutes)
> The problem is that we had to introduce a lot of code in order to solve
> this problem, has anyone else encounter this problem? we do not want to use
> mod_xml_curl as we want to take care bringing the file to the machine
> Another approach that we thought is that a database might be much better
> fit in here, because every xml update includes the entire tenant (business)
> and has the potential in harming other users in the same tenant, also DB
> has much higher capacities then XMLs, did anyone think of enabling MySQL as
> a directory of parameters instead of xml?
> Thanks,
> Yiftach.
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:consulting at freeswitch.orghttp://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Siteshttp://www.freeswitch.orghttp://wiki.freeswitch.orghttp://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing listFreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.orghttp://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-usershttp://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> 
> 
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20121023/a6c7405b/attachment.html