[Freeswitch-users] Gateway failover with LUA

[Muhammad Naseer Bhatti]

They are two different gateways with two different names, but the same
IP address yet the port is different. Possible that limit subsystem is
imposing the   limit on the IP address itself and not able to
distinguish between the different ports.

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Muhammad Naseer Bhatti
<nbhatti at gmail.com> wrote:
> Possible but here is the problem. When limit is set against two of the
> gateways,
>
> session:execute("limit", "hash gateway_channels v132_5000 10")
> session:execute("limit", "hash gateway_channels v132_5010 10")
>
> It sets limit of 10 channels for each gateway. But when the bridge is made,
>
> [gateway=v132_5010]sofia/gateway/v132_5010/9198|[gateway=v132_5000]sofia/gateway/v132_5000/9198
>
> The limit is imposed on both gateways.
>
> 2012-05-27 22:13:48.371539 [INFO] switch_limit.c:126 incr called:
> gateway_channels_v132_5000 max:10, interval:0
> 2012-05-27 22:13:48.371539 [INFO] mod_hash.c:202 Usage for
> gateway_channels_v132_5000 is now 3/10
> 2012-05-27 22:13:48.371539 [INFO] switch_limit.c:126 incr called:
> gateway_channels_v132_5010 max:10, interval:0
> 2012-05-27 22:13:48.371539 [INFO] mod_hash.c:202 Usage for
> gateway_channels_v132_5010 is now 3/10
>
> Is this is a bug or  supposed to work like this?  Though the call is
> connected to gateway name v132_5010 only.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Avi Marcus <avi at avimarcus.net> wrote:
>> How about a bridge2, bridge3, etc variable? Then your static dialplan can
>> see if those are set, and if so, use them.
>>
>> -Avi
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Muhammad Naseer Bhatti <nbhatti at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, I am trying to implement a gateway failover functionality with
>>> lua. Right now I am using limit and using hash backend to limit number
>>> of channels to each gateway. Since I am forwarding all calls with a
>>> default dialplan which is sending all calls to application lua and the
>>> bridge is done outside lua setting all the necessary vars.
>>> The idea is if all channels of first gateway are occupied, send the
>>> call to second gateway in the list and so on. Any idea how to
>>> implement this with lua? Can not seem to find the logic. If I query
>>> with limit_status it is going to be a query on every call. In a high
>>> call volume scenario, I don't think this would be really a good
>>> choice. Any ideas, thoughts?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> _________________________________________________________________________
>>> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
>>> consulting at freeswitch.org
>>> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
>>> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
>>> http://www.cluecon.com
>>>
>>> Join Us At ClueCon - Aug 7-9, 2012
>>>
>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________________
>> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
>> consulting at freeswitch.org
>> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>>
>> 
>> 
>>
>> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
>> http://www.cluecon.com
>>
>> Join Us At ClueCon - Aug 7-9, 2012
>>
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>