[Freeswitch-users] What is the different between FS linux and MS windows version

[Peter Olsson]

Hit "send" to soon... :)

What I meant to say last was that I recommend using Windows 2008 R2, or at least Windows 2008. Microsoft has improved their timing in the kernel, starting with these kernels (and also Vista / Windows 7).

/Peter
________________________________
Från: Peter Olsson
Skickat: den 27 maj 2012 15:02
Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help
Ämne: RE: [Freeswitch-users] What is the different between FS linux and MS windows version

I would say it's more or less the same (FS build natively on both platforms).

I'm using it on both platforms, and it's been working perfect on both. There is a bigger user base on Linux I guess (if that's important), and if you want to run HA-setups, you would need Linux to setup Kamailio etc.

If you're running Windows, I recommend



________________________________
Från: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] för Albert Nguyen [albert_nguyen16 at hotmail.com]
Skickat: den 27 maj 2012 13:47
Till: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
Ämne: [Freeswitch-users] What is the different between FS linux and MS windows version

Hi

I have installed a FS windows version on a DELL R210 server running windows 2003 server. Is there any different between the FS windows and linux version in term of capability  and performance?

Thanks in advance,

Al
!DSPAM:4fc214f832761559443750!