[Freeswitch-users] Problems with t38_gateway

Steven Lam, KeenSystems B.V. s.lam at keensystems.eu
Thu Mar 1 18:55:55 MSK 2012


Hi,

I consider a gateway only reacting to T38 re-INVITES and not initiating T38 re-INVITES "passive".
My setup works great for this, the only problem is when both the A- and B-leg send a T38 re-INVITES something goes wrong.

Steven

> -----Original Message-----
> From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-
> users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Steve Underwood
> Sent: donderdag 1 maart 2012 15:58
> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Problems with t38_gateway
> 
> On 02/29/2012 09:21 PM, Steven Lam, KeenSystems B.V. wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm experimenting with the t38_gateway in mod_spandsp to build a
> gateway that fully supports "passive" T_38. My test config looks like this:
> Interesting term. What do you consider to be "passive" T.38?
> 
> Steve
> 
> __________________________________________________________
> _______________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
> 
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org





Join us at ClueCon 2011 Aug 9-11, 2011
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list