[Freeswitch-users] Bind extension to an IP address
ocset
ocset at the800group.com
Tue Jun 26 13:52:42 MSD 2012
My thought were as follows
If I could bind all of the internal extensions to an IP address, then I
can limit the number of extension that are exposed to outside attack. So
if I open up port 5090 and allow registration from internet based
phones, I can limit it to only a couple of extensions rather than having
all extensions open to the outside world.
The purpose of these few extensions is to allow someone in the office to
transfer a call to someone on the road. They would not be given
permission to use any of the gateways so even if someone did manage to
hack in, they would not be able to make long distance calls - limit the
damage.
Does that make sense?
Regards
O
On 25/06/12 22:27, Michael Collins wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Richard Brady <rnbrady at gmail.com
> <mailto:rnbrady at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Is there an equivalent for gateways?
>
> I can't find a way to bind incoming calls from a CIDR to a
> particular gateway.
>
> Just curious - what functionality do you need this for?
> -MC
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
>
>
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> Join Us At ClueCon - Aug 7-9, 2012
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20120626/005e96d0/attachment.html
Join us at ClueCon 2011 Aug 9-11, 2011
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list