[Freeswitch-users] Performance Testing

[Hanie Maghsoudy]

Yeah, I believe so, since when calls are establishing the cpu load is not a
problem.

On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Henry Huang <red.rain.seven at gmail.com>wrote:

> From my experience playing with different CPS values. The CPU spike is
> usually caused by the 'tearing down' process. If you increase the call
> duration, you will be able to see CPU spikes when channels times out and
> starting to tear down.
>
> Henry
>
> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Hanie Maghsoudy <h.maghsoudy at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I searched for FreeSwitch call capacity, but most of the results wasn't
>> new. So, I wanna ask if anybody has either tested FreeSwitch's performance
>> recently, or got a dramatic result in real environment?
>>
>> I tested call quality on this machine:
>>
>> Virtual FreeSwitch server
>> OS: CentOS release 6.2 - x86_64
>> CPU: 8 processor - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5670  @ 2.93GHz
>> Memory: 8 G
>>
>> After receiving incoming calls, FreeSwitch routed them to another sip
>> server, without transcoding. The other server transmitted calls by playing
>> an audio file.  Meanwhile, I called an extension in FreeSwitch to test the
>> call quality.
>>
>> The result was like this:
>>
>> 1000 Concurrent calls
>> Call duration: 160s
>> Call rate: 6 cps (just creating channels)
>> Max used Memory: 1416M
>> Max CPU load: 0.24
>> Max Network throughput (recv/send): 6711k/80k
>> Quality: Good
>>
>> This test was taken before tearing down the channels.
>>
>> Then, I took another test to estimate calls per second, and it wasn't
>> what I was expected!
>>
>>
>> 150 Concurrent calls
>> Call duration: 4s
>> Call rate: 30 cps (creating and tearing down)
>> Max used Memory: 1293M
>> Max CPU load: 4.50
>> Max Network throughput (recv/send): 828k/60k
>> Quality: Average
>>
>> And when I increase call rate to 50 cps:
>>
>> 1000 Concurrent calls
>> Call duration: 4s
>> Call rate: 50 cps (creating and tearing down)
>> Max used Memory: 1730M
>> Max CPU load: *29.9*
>> Max Network throughput (recv/send): 1367k/202k
>> Quality: Bad
>>
>> Why call per second is such a big problem? Did anyone get a better result
>> on this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hanie
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________________
>> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
>> consulting at freeswitch.org
>> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>>
>> 
>> 
>>
>> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
>> http://www.cluecon.com
>>
>> Join Us At ClueCon - Aug 7-9, 2012
>>
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> 
> 
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> Join Us At ClueCon - Aug 7-9, 2012
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20120707/64d59a88/attachment.html