[Freeswitch-users] Skypopen - Skype Client on a different machine than Freeswitch with Skypopen module

[A E [Gmail]]

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Seven Du <dujinfang at gmail.com> wrote:


> On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 at 2:20 AM, A E [Gmail] wrote:
>
> Ok cool. Thank you so much.
>
> I found this as some very slimmed down modules.conf.xml figuring FS
> running on an embedded platform might give me the best case from which to
> build on. It's here:
> https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/freeswitch/files/etc.minimal/autoload_configs/modules.conf.xml?order=date
>
> Apart from adding mod_skypopen to this, does this look good? What else
> needs to be added to it?
>
> Add anything you need, see
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FreeSwitch_Modules for detail
>
> you still can remove some modules if you don't use them, e.g. mod_cdr_csv
> etc.
>

Haha mmm yes, I do understand that but maybe I didn't phrase my question
correctly...I'm talking strictly in reference to the FS-Skype box in your
environment and what is the bare minimum I can have on that box to be able
to successfully run it as a Skype gateway. Kinda trying to get hands on
your modules.conf.xml but if that's an inappropriate request, then I
apologize in advance.


>
>
> Thanks so much for your help :)
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Seven Du <dujinfang at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, exactly, you could remove any unnecessary modules if you don't use
> them.
>
> to be clear, you could send calls from FS1 to FS2 and FS3 give you have
> proper dialplan set to route calls to the desired destination.
> that means you could just treat FS2 and FS3 as a third party sip gateway
> but they can routing calls to anywhere you want.
>
> FS1 (mod_sofia) ----------------------  (mod_sofia)FS2(mod_skypopen)
> -------------------skype
>                            \
>                             \------------------
>  (mod_sofia)FS3(mod_dingaling) ---------------------gtalk
>
> That testimonial is completely following the wiki's sharing rule, but you
> can use the idea completely freely.
>
> On Monday, January 30, 2012 at 12:46 PM, A E [Gmail] wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Seven Du <dujinfang at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  skype clients should run with FS on the same box.
>
> You could run both FS and skype clients on another box just as a gateway
> if you want scale. We had run multi- FS instances on one box for
> scale/stable purpose, but you can get the idea from
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FreeSWITCH_Testimonial_on_Idapted.com
>
> --
> About: http://about.me/dujinfang
> Blog: http://www.dujinfang.com
> Proj:  http://www.freeswitch.org.cn
>
> Sent with Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com>
>
> Thanks Seven. I had a good read of that testimonial and it's basically
> saying what you just said here in a line. The question now is are the
> design docs for that setup proprietary or kinda sorta can be GPL'ed or
> "shared" in some form? :)
>
> If not, then just to clarify, the FS-Skype servers load their own
> mod_skypopen and is just a gateway to send calls to once it's determined by
> the FS in the center acting like a soft-switch/call-control platform? Is it
> completely possible to run/build an FS instance with just mod_skyopen or
> mod_dingaling (and anything else that's fundamentally needed by FS) loaded?
> I mean I could Google this but it might help if you could tell me what your
> modules.conf.xml looks like for Skype only instance?
>
> Thanks so much in advance, and apologies if I'm being unreasonable in
> requesting for the info :)
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20120130/fa735e55/attachment.html