[Freeswitch-users] NAT traversal - the final say..!

[S. Scott]

Dave, when you say, "...If you're going to use IPv6, set up the
infrastructure FIRST," we both agree 100%.  You appear to have a well
ordered DNS infrastructure and an admin discipline and overarch to
effect it, where the scope of the tool covers off your operations and
problem set.

:-)

The mental gymnastics -- and the cacoffiny -- will rise over what
"infrastructure" components work good/better/best for each admin once
the carriers/providers, data centers, hosting providers, wireless,
"guestnet" providers -- starbucks, hotels, corporate visitors nets,
etc. -- all start trying it their way.

And all i'm saying is that 1:1 NAT (not PAT) can (and will) play a
viable role in competent/robust IPv6 infrastructures; and, therefore,
IMO, NAT isn't going away through IPv6 pass 1, 2, or 3.

Bet 'ya a dollar and see you in five-seven years at Cluecon.

;-)

Cheers,

—————
iThing:  Big thumbs & little keys. Please excuse typo, spelling and
grammar errors • Last night I played a blank CD at full blast. The
Mime next door went nuts.


On 2012-12-24, at 21:10, "Dave R. Kompel" <drk at drkngs.net> wrote:

> If you're going to use IPv6, set up the infrastructure FIRST,