[Freeswitch-users] - freeswitch bye issue

[Simon Leck]

Hi Pedar, 

 

Thanks for your reply. At first I thought it was NAT issue so to isolate the
problem I used a Public IP but I still get the same result? I have used
wireshark to do a trace but I don't see FS sending a bye to A?

 

Kindly advice me on how else could I solved this issue. On the NAT Part, I
have enable RTP keep alive as well. Under RTCP, I have the keep alive turned
on as well?

 

Which other place are there setting I can configure with?

 

Thanks in advanced Pedar for your kindest help

 

Many thanks

Simon Leck

 

From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Peder
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:57 AM
To: 'FreeSWITCH Users Help'
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] - freeswitch bye issue

 

It should happen automatically.  Is A behind NAT?  Sounds like a
firewall/NAT may be dropping the bye.  Also, have you done a debug on FS to
see if it actually sends a bye or not to A?

 

From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Simon
Leck
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 11:42 AM
To: 'FreeSWITCH Users Help'
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] - freeswitch bye issue

 

Hi Everyone, kindly help if you can 

 

At the moment I did encounter a issue, A leg user called a b leg user and
when b leg user hanged up (Bye is not send by freeswitch to the A leg user)
the only way I could hanged up this call  to hanged up the A leg user
manually? Would be great if someone could enlighten me on how this can be
achieved?

 

Thanks in advanced to anyone for helping me out

 

Thanks again

Simon Leck

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110907/492ab309/attachment.html