[Freeswitch-users] High load on database server

[Madovsky]

but, is anyone experienced that with shared ODBC ? (managing more than 330 
concurrent calls)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Madovsky" <infos at madovsky.org>
To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] High load on database server


> ha ok, good luck so
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Cliff Wells" <cliff at develix.com>
> To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 12:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] High load on database server
>
>
>> On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 11:55 -0400, Madovsky wrote:
>>> I means that depend the quality of your script ;)
>>
>> Quality isn't the issue here.  The script is too simple to be incorrect
>> (and it carefully releases the odbc connection back to the pool in a
>> hangup handler).  I have written poor-quality code plenty of times, but
>> 25 years as a programmer usually allows me the luxury of knowing when
>> I'm doing it, thanks.
>>
>> In any case, Lua scripts work fine.  Google will tell you that unixODBC
>> before 2.3.0 was a bit of a mess, so I expect the issue lies there, but
>> again, I emphasize, everything WORKS GREAT (been using it for a couple
>> of years now) until you get to very high concurrency (about 330
>> concurrent calls on a single system).  If you don't expect to handle
>> more than 300 concurrent calls, then you do not need to worry about it.
>> At all.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Cliff
>>
>>
>>
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org