[Freeswitch-users] HA: Starting FreeSWITCH empties the callstable?

[Madovsky]

cluster principle is a group of nodes.
each node has a different name of course..

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vik Killa" <vipkilla at gmail.com>
To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] HA: Starting FreeSWITCH empties the 
callstable?


> was FS 3277: http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FS-3277 actually committed?
> If not, why? Seems like a good addition.
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:24 AM,  <B.Tietz at pinguin.ag> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> That is the reason. I think FS is able to act as a cluster. So many 
>> machines act as one and should have the same name...
>> Just an idea.
>>
>> greets.
>>
>>
>>
>>>Can I ask when exactly the "switchname" should be used then?
>>>
>>>FS 3277: http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FS-3277
>>>
>>>Suggests it was implemented for the exact reason of keeping the names of 
>>>two switches in an HA configuration identical, but it seems they are best 
>>> >left separate.
>>>
>>>I don't mind cleaning up some of the detail in the HA Wiki but would just 
>>>like to know when the names should be the same and when they should be 
>>> >different i.e. shoudl the names be the same for kind kind of active / 
>>>active setup?
>>
>>
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org